Mike,
There is no excuse for using uncertified gear no matter who is at fault.
This attitude is going to hurt the WISP industry more than anything.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Mike Hammett wrote:
It's called prioritization, we all do it. Going after ma and pa wisp
isn't very high on their list of things to do. With as rare as they
bust a rogue vendor or manufacturer, how often do you think they go
after someone intentionally using grossly overpowered gear, much less
certified radio\antenna combo's.
They're going to go after a rice rocket going 105 mph in a 65 before a
Ford F-150 doing 70.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ?
Marlon,
Do you really believe the FCC does not care if WISP's are using
uncertified gear? I doubt that you actually believe this.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
I prefer certified gear. Pre built and ready to install.
Having said that Dawn, when's the last time the FCC took a wisp to
task for using non certified configurations?
Hell, I've spent TWO YEARS trying to get an operator running over
the eirp limits (way over) dealt with and still no headway.
The bad (and in many ways good) think is that they just don't seem
to care. They want the consumer taken care of. When you think about
it, we whine about all of the things that the big boys get away
with, all the while, we get away with things too.
Shrug.
marlon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ?
Rick,
There is no way you would be legit if you decided to do this on
your own. Considering the conversation that went on a few weeks
back mentioned that people used Mikrotik systems because of the
feature set and not cost why would you not buy an already certified
system. To be safe I would go with a system that is already
certified instead of chancing it.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Rick,
Does that mean we can take a 532 board and a cm9 and use it
elsewhere
and consider it certified ?
No. You would have to use the exact same parts to be considered
legal from the antenna to the power supply. This would mean you
would have to get the manufacturer of all these parts in the
trango system. If you took this approach you would be taking on
the responsibility to make sure this really a was certified system.
I assume you read the FAQ that Jack Unger setup to answer these
questions about certification.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
