Smith, Rick wrote:
Cheaper / Better. Faster would remain to be seen.
I figured that would be the answer, but how does that help people who
have no idea why MT might be cheaper or better? I'm not trying to start
an argument; I would just like to know what about MT makes it worth
risking one's business vs the other solutions out there.
I like having filtering / queuing / all the mikrotik
routing features, etc right behind the radio instead of
one hop inside the antenna.
Does that make any technical difference or is it just a preference?
And it doesn't matter whether Mikrotik's really interested or not
in the market - Ubiquity Networks IS, and they have the card that
we'll all be using - SR/XR3 - all built on the existing Atheros
implementations in Mikrotik
Ubiquity would have to produce the complete the system and certified it,
which may be what they want, but seems a good bit away from what they
currently do. I know they have a complete system now, but that one
system is a long way away from what other certified vendors provide.
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
