I said this several months ago and I'll say it again.... MT and Star-OS
are used because of price. Period.
If the "certified" systems come out and are double the price (so $400
for a RB532 type solution compared with $200 now) how many people are
going to start using the certified ones? Very few. Even if it's only $50
extra, are people really going to pay that much extra when so far they
haven't worried about it?
Travis
Microserv
Matt Liotta wrote:
George Rogato wrote:
Matt
The reason we like stuff MT and Star, it works and we like it.
I'm glad it works and that you like it because you like it. That
doesn't really help me understand why one would choose MT over
something else. I mean there has to be something beyond that you like
it if you are willing to use it in favor of something else that is
certified.
I don't really care for the whole discussion of whether certified gear
should be used or not. Every piece of gear has advantages and
disadvantages as well as pricing considerations. Regardless of whether
someone is willing to use uncertified gear, I am sure that given the
choice between uncertified and certified everyone would choose
certified every time. Therefore, uncertified gear is at a disadvantage
to other gear, so it must make up for this disadvantage some other way
or no one would choose it. What is MT's advantage?
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
