Michael Erskine wrote:
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
All,
Some on this list have felt it important to steer the discussion
towards personal attacks and try to discredit me anytime I want to
discuss how the rules and regulations affect this industry as a
whole. My only agenda is to help others to understand how they can
become compliant and do my best to explain how to read the rules set
forth by the authorities. Since there is a lack of appreciation for
my posts I feel I need to move on to a more professional venue. Good
luck with all your future endeavors.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Ahem, Sorry to see you go. I didn't see personal attacks but I didn't
read all the posts. I don't think it is necessary to tar the "venue"
because there are people on the "venue" you can't get along with.
Why not stay and prove your points? When you are right you are
right. Eventually the truth will come out.
-m-
Mike,
I know email is lousy communication because there is a lack of tone and
emotion, but many of your responses come off as personal attacks. Maybe
it is supposed to be sarcasm, but as I read it, it was an attack.
If you don't agree, say why you don't agree. No reason to just throw
sarcastic jabs. One of the rules of netiquette is that if you are not
adding anything to the conversation, then don't post. (I am guilty of
this at times myself).
Yeah, it was a harped on issue. (It seems the longest threads involve
MT). From what I read, most people are offering opinions, not facts.
And there is no shortage of Opinion. And in the case of MT, it is like
arguing religion or politics -- you aren't going to change anyone's
mind. Hence, why at least one person thought the list was hijacked.
And threads like this with even perceived attacks, don't help the Org.
Regards,
Peter @ RAD-INFO, Inc.
www.4isps.com
www.rad-info.net
marketingideaguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/