On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
1. The ISP will know a actual intercept subpoena is coming before they receive it.
Actually, in a couple of cases, this was true. In the others, the subpoena came without any notice.
3. The LEA would like the ISP to have all the CALEA "I's" dotted and "T's" crossed, but are willing to work with a cooperative provider.
This is the main point of the post I made. They are willing to work with us, because we have something they need.
Can you verify that they ISPs got their direct expenses back from the LEAs? That would be valuable information to have!
I do know in one case, the ISP did get paid. He only billed the LEA for my fees, plus some other small expense, though I don't recall what it was for. If I recall correctly, the total bill was about $800.
I was told by a law enforcement agent that Verizon charges something like $1250 + some amount per day for each tap. I don't recall the actual fees, but it was close to that amount.
I DO believe that the LEAs will become more technically aware over time. I also believe that they will be less forgiving of providers who do not have a CALEA plan over time.
This is still new to both law enforcement and WISPs. I agree that over time, those that are not capable of providing the information will begin to see themselves in trouble.
-- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6 Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf Mikrotik Certified Consultant http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
