Marlon K. Schafer wrote: > I still think dues should be based on customer base. If you have 100 subs > you'll pay $100 per year. $400 subs, 400. 10,000 subs...... I was over > ruled on this when we first did the bylaws though.
But then you'd have to randomly audit members to ensure they were accurately reporting this information. Given that some WISPs don't even want to provide this information to the government when mandated by law, getting them to provide accurate information voluntarily, especially when they have an explicit financial interest in under-reporting their membership... You'd have a bit more money, but you'd turn around and spend it all on "compliance" or some such nonsense. Anyway. I think one of the most important details in such a position would be making sure that this person is held accountable to the board, and doesn't start lobbying for stuff without the board's approval. The last thing WISPA needs is someone in a flashy suit going into business for himself. (See also "sleeper agent.") I don't like the job title - he'll be taking direction from the board and the membership, not giving direction himself - but that's a quibble, and even if it's misleading the name sounds weighty and impressive. David Smith MVN.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
