Thanks for pointing that out. In my mind that was what I was attempting to say. I guess I failed to take it to completion. I was trying to make the point that gain ~~ size~~ beamwidth but only in the broad general case. The FCC is not really caring about gain or size(in these cases); but since they all three are usually proportional many workers in the field use size as the rule of thumb.
A very well designed high performance parabolic reflector can have the same sidelobe characteristics as a larger reflector. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:48 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dragonwave antenna pattern for RM > Chuck, > > Yes, that is right, it is the radiation characteristics that are > specified, > that must be met. > > My point being "size" is not one of the criteria listed required to be > met. > > Tom DeReggi > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
