Yeah, I am always on the lookout for the ILEC comment here and there. Our ILEC has 900 customers scattered over 12 counties of two states with about 800 miles of fiber. We have 13 central office switches. That is an average of about 70 subscribers per CO switch. We have 21 office codes/wire centers. So, we don't really fit the mold of most ILECs but the same rules apply. Running an ILEC this small forces one to master the whole regulatory landscape where the RBOCs have whole floors of office buildings devoted to single issues. We have 5 times more WISP customers, all in RBOC, former RBOC or Frontier turf. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Yunker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 12:46 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need.
> Chuck, > > I wasn't suggesting that the POTS tariffs were insufficient to support the > POTS infrastructure. I was drawing the conclusion that most of the large > ILECs have opted to structure their DSL service offering so as to make a > service bundle the only "rational" way to purchase the DSL service. The > cost differential between Naked-DSL and DSL+Phone is often such that it is > CHEAPER to buy the DSL+Phone. > > Thus, the ILEC can force people to choose between continuing to subscribe > to > POTS or not getting DSL at all. > > As you note... YOU as a non-RBOC ILEC have the option of refusing to offer > "Naked DSL". I should have been more clear with my initial comments. My > assumptions are drawn upon the RBOCs (what's left of them). I believe > that > AT&T is under an agreement with the FTC which provides that they must > provide naked DSL in all markets in which they currently of DSL. I > wouldn't > be surprised if Verizon were not under the same sort of agreement. These > were concessions made when negotiating the approval of the RBOC + LD > megamergers. Since the RBOCs account for over 90% of the POTS service in > the U.S. I sometimes slip and refer to them generically as ILECs. As you > validly point out, some independent ILECs continue to exist and have much > more flexibility in their service offerings. > > - Larry > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3 > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 2:07 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need. > > Not exactly true. The POTS infrastructure rate of return is recovered > through basic rates, NECA and USF settlements. It truly supports itself > nicely. We do have to option of refusing to offer "Naked DSL". But that > extra revenue does not get applied to local loop support. It goes in our > pocket to be spent any way we want. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry Yunker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 10:05 AM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need. > > >> While the ILECs may have been unable to directly pass along the cost of >> their broadband infrastructure to the consumer, they have successful >> engaged >> in a reverse of the concept. They have placed the burden of their dying >> POTS infrastructure on their broadband subscribers. >> >> ILECS have instituted tying agreements which essentially force broadband >> subscribers into purchasing tariffed services. For example, if you want >> $19.95/month DSL, you must-purchase the ILEC's $62/month all frills >> included >> phone service package. Of course, someone will cry out what about >> "naked-DSL"? Yes, it exists in most markets now, but it will cost you >> roughly $50-$55/month for the same plan that you would get for >> $19.95/month >> if you were so kind as to agree to subsidize ma-Bell's poor starving >> land-line phone service. >> >> Seems ironic doesn't it... the ILEC can't force its telephone subscribers >> to >> pay for its broadband expansion through tariffed rates (it wouldn't work >> because most people would get cell phones and ditch the land line before >> they would agree to pay a bunch more for their land line), so ILECs work >> the >> system backwards... people still want DSL, so lets force them to buy our >> next-to-useless landline phone service in order to get our coveted >> broadband >> service. >> >> Unfortunately, I don't see people cutting their electric company service >> and >> installing solar cells as a replacements anytime soon, so if the electric >> company were to engage in broadband as suggested, it would be scary for >> all >> other broadband carriers. >> >> - Larry >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3 >> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 10:53 AM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need. >> >> Not true. Not true at all. Cable Companies are not rate of return >> regulated. Every dollar they spend is below the line. The ILECS are >> strictly regulated as to what can be spent above the line. Tarrifed >> rates >> ONLY support tarrifed services. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 11:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need. >> >> >>> Why not? >>> >>> Isn't that kinda what Cable Cos and ILECs Do? >>> >>> Tom DeReggi >>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc >>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Chuck McCown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 2:37 PM >>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need. >>> >>> >>>> The power company wants to take rate payer money and build a broadband >>>> network that will contact each meter for the purpose of managing >>>> energy. >>>> It >>>> will also supply broadband to the homeowner if they want. This should >>>> not >>>> be allowed. >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:34 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Chuck McCown wrote: >>>>>> Time to speak up. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone care to translate this for those among us who don't speak >>>>> lawyerese, and who don't live/work in Indiana? >>>>> >>>>> David Smith >>>>> MVN.net >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/ >>>>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >>>>> >>>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>> >>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >>>> http://signup.wispa.org/ >>>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >>>> >>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>> >>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >>> http://signup.wispa.org/ >>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >>> >>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] >>> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >>> >> >> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
