I thought that next gen wireless had a different set of numbers defined.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------------------------------------------- From: "David E. Smith" <d...@mvn.net> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 1:38 PM To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: Economic Stimulus Funds: Public Meeting HostedbyLeadGovernment Agencies > Rick Harnish wrote: > >> 2) Promote speed: The NTIA should establish speed guidelines and >> benchmarks >> and require grant applicants to detail actual -- not advertised -- >> network >> speeds, with priority given to next-generation projects. > > Did the language defining "next-generation" as 100Mbps down/20Mbps up > make it into the final bill? > > (If so, does anyone have any idea at all how to deliver "next-gen" > service wirelessly on the typical WISP budget? I'm somewhat doubtful, > but...) > > David Smith > MVN.net > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
