I have lots of experience there Marlon. Use 900 for the last mile. Use
4.9 for the multipoint backbone of the 900 cells and to feed any fixed
locations (buildings, traffic systems, cameras). Ideally, integrate the
in-vehicle 900 MHz CPE with an 802.11 rugedized AP so officers can have
a personal WLAN microcell around their vehicles for PDA, etc. use. 


Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 900 vs. 4.9 for emergency vehicles

Hi All,

Anyone have any experience on this?

I was thinking 4.9 but I've been told that the ranges are very short.

There isn't likely much (I'll have to run around and test) 900 out in my
rural area, maybe that would be a better system?

thoughts?
marlon



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to