|
... then use 900... Marlon K. Schafer wrote: It doesn't. That's the problem. Besides, there is NO reason to stick public safety with 100% of the backbone costs.I'm only worried about the last mile (or 15 miles in my case) here. marlon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Hensley" <[email protected]> To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:09 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900 vs. 4.9 for emergency vehiclesWhat do you mean the public will have to have access to the backbone? I didn't think 4.9 rules allow any "Public" traffic across it - only public safety and other related traffic, even if it's Internet service for those departments. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:00 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900 vs. 4.9 for emergency vehicles Can't do that. The public will HAVE to have access to the backbone. There's no other way to pay for the network. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Leary" <[email protected]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:58 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900 vs. 4.9 for emergency vehiclesI have lots of experience there Marlon. Use 900 for the last mile. Use 4.9 for the multipoint backbone of the 900 cells and to feed any fixed locations (buildings, traffic systems, cameras). Ideally, integrate the in-vehicle 900 MHz CPE with an 802.11 rugedized AP so officers can have a personal WLAN microcell around their vehicles for PDA, etc. use. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:19 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 900 vs. 4.9 for emergency vehicles Hi All, Anyone have any experience on this? I was thinking 4.9 but I've been told that the ranges are very short. There isn't likely much (I'll have to run around and test) 900 out in my rural area, maybe that would be a better system? thoughts? marlon ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993 Cisco Press Author - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs" WISPs - Do you know where your customers are? For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger> Phone 818-227-4220 Email <[email protected]> |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
