Yuck. I have never seen this with the Mohawk Gel filled cable we use.

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of e...@wisp-router.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:49 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ethernet Cabling
> 
> Actually I think you had some gel leak out of the cable and not water.
> Seen it numerous times especially after a warm summer when the gel gets
> liquefied one place have 180ft vertical 5 ft horizontal and about 15ft
> rolled up on a 1.5ft diameter and bottom feeding a cabinet. At the
> bottom under the cable I always find some sticky mess. Never any water
> tho.
> 
> /Eje
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Tom DeReggi" <wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>
> 
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:05:42
> To: WISPA General List<wireless@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ethernet Cabling
> 
> 
> Quick note on Gel fil....
> 
> I had a link fed by outdoor direct burial Ethernet, and the cable came
> 8
> feet down from the radio, went horizontally 50 feet, dropped 5 feet to
> inside penhouse roof, went horizontally100ft with several turns, then
> dropped 8 feet to wall cabnet. A mistake was made during install, and
> teh
> CAT5 was fed into the cabner from the top instead of the bottom. Once
> cable
> intere the cabnet it made a right angle to mid case, where it plugged
> into
> lightning protector (upward into the protector). Mounted in the cabnet
> below
> the lightning protector was a VLAN switch. At the radio, the 1/2" thick
> direct buriel fed into the trango radio pass thru.  My point here is
> that
> there was 150 feet of horizontal cable and only about 20feet of
> verticle
> run.  About a month later, we had a heavy rain. Several days later, the
> building's service went down.  I went onsite, and a drop or two of
> water
> dripped down into one of the ethernet switch ports from the end of teh
> CAT5
> at the lightning protector, and burnt/shorted out the switch.  INside
> the
> trango radio was mostly dry except minimal dampness arounf the CAT5
> cable.
> So... condensation caused some water to build up and drop into the CAT5
> area, entered inside the CAT5 cable jacket at that point, traveled
> 150ft
> through the inside of the cable, just enough to short out my switch.
> 
> So my point is.... Gell fill has a purpose. To add one more level of
> protection to stop water from travelling through the inside of the
> cable.
> Water can find ways to get it. The Gell will also keep the water
> seperated
> from the inside cable wires itself so the cable does not corrode or
> rust. Or
> that condensated water does not make it to the inner cables.
> 
> With that said.... Gell Fill should not be used in areas where it
> travels in
> a plenum/ceiling area that builds up heat, where there is significant
> verticle length of cable such as telecom risers, where the CAT5
> terminates
> in a space that is a traffic are, that needs to look clean, like a
> client's
> suite. The reason is that when the gel gets warm it starts to drip, and
> oose
> out of the end of the connector. It can drip into the CAT5 Jack, it can
> drip
> on the floor and wall, etc.  And cable should always be going upward
> (drip
> loop) into a Jack, so gel would drip to a harmless space via gravity.
> 
> If we are on a flat roof cell site, terminating in a penthouse, we'll
> usually use gel fill, for longevity. However, we'll usually prefer to
> use
> non-gel for other application, so its cleaner and easier to work with.
> Although the gel has a purpose, I'm not sure the reward is worth the
> hassle.
> 
> I tend to first pick the needed diameter cable for the application.
> Second,
> the needed durrabilty for the job. Third, insist on being shielded, and
> select appropriate shield design for the job.
> I rarely give a darn whether it is gel or not gel, what ever the
> distributor
> has at the right price, that meets the other specs.
> 
> If the cable actually is going to be used in a direct buriel type
> applciation where their is water buildup, for example barried in the
> gravel
> on a commercial flat roof, It would probably be advisable to us gel.
> There is higher risk of cable puncture, and water intrusion. Where as
> if
> there are places to tie off cable, such as to blocks on roof, or
> outside of
> conduit, anchored to wall, strappedd to gutter, etc I generally don't
> think
> the gel is needed. A good cable will last a real long time, without
> it..
> 
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ethernet Cabling
> 
> 
> > I've heard of people being afraid water would get inside the cable
> and
> > that
> > is the purpose of the gel.  Can't say I've ever seen water in the
> line,
> > but
> > I know I have never looked!
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
> > improbable, must be the truth."
> > --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Jayson Baker
> > <jay...@spectrasurf.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Wouldn't it be worse if water ran down the cable?
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Scott Reed
> <scottr...@onlyinternet.net
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Gel filled on towers is a mess.  The gel runs down the cable and
> oozes
> >> > out all over the inside of the connector, etc. at the bottom of
> the
> >> tower.
> >> >
> >> > Michael Baird wrote:
> >> > > We are getting ready to order ethernet cabling, and looking at
> some
> >> > > different options for the towers and client installs. I was
> wondering
> >> > > what people here liked to use. Particularily I'm interested in
> what
> >> > > you
> >> > > look for in shielding/water protection, should I get a flooded
> cable,
> >> if
> >> > > so with what? Will the gel filled type overheat in the sun?
> Should i
> >> run
> >> > > all of this in conduit, at least for the AP's at the towers?
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > > Michael Baird
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >> > > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> > > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >> > >
> >> > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >> > >
> >> > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >> > >
> >> > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >> > > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.42/2137 - Release
> Date:
> >> > 05/27/09 07:50:00
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Scott Reed
> >> > Sr. Systems Engineer
> >> > GAB Midwest
> >> > 1-800-363-1544 x4000
> >> > Cell: 260-273-7239
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >> >
> >> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >> >
> >> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >> >
> >> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to