Robert West wrote: > Why should [big companies] invest > their cash in building a market when we can do it for them and once it's > about ripe, they can just walk in and pick it? We need to do what we can to > protect our little piece of the pie somehow.
A small entrepreneur sees an opportunity, builds something that lots of people want, makes some money from it, then a larger company buys it and makes said entrepreneur filthy rich (or at least better-off than he was). The customers win (they get the benefit of the new network regardless of who built it), the guy that just cashed out wins, the bigger company that buys the network wins (they presumably see profit potential or else they wouldn't buy). I thought this sort of sweat-equity-for-cash tradeoff was basically the American dream. I don't see this being a bad thing for anyone involved. David Smith MVN.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
