Took the day off to go for a Bike ride......

The actual software build is ....
TR6-4.0.3Rt 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John Scrivner 
  To: thic...@rockies.net 
  Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:40 PM
  Subject: Fwd: [WISPA] Tranzeo 900 Latency


  What firmware version is that? Is it 4.02 or 4.03?
  Thanks,
  Scriv



  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
  From: Terry Hickey <thic...@rockies.net>
  Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo 900 Latency
  To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>


  John
     Tranzeo released a new firmware update the other day that has helped my
  900 system a lot. Better signal and much faster pings.  I have been fighting
  the same problem as you for the past couple of months.

  Terry


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "John Scrivner" <j...@scrivner.com>
  To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>

  Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:45 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo 900 Latency



  > Thanks for all these good tips. The items below are the things we have
  > tried
  > so far with no success. We are using smaller channels, H-pol. Filters have
  > not helped the problem, noise floor is actually pretty good, C/I of about
  > 20
  > on most CPE.. We are going to try the two setting changes that Daniel and
  > Tom advised in other posts relating to beacon and RTS on clients. I will
  > report our results.
  > Thanks to all!
  > Scriv
  >
  >
  > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:33 AM, 3-dB Networks <wi...@3-db.net> wrote:
  >
  >> What does your noise floor look like? C/I?
  >> Have you tried moving from H-pol to V-pol and vice versa?
  >> Could it be self interference (which I think might be the biggest problem
  >> with 900MHz, at least the possibility of it)?
  >> What type of antennas are you using... can you sectorize further or put
  >> higher gain antennas at the clients?
  >> Can you add filters possibly to help with the noise?
  >> How large are your channels?  Can you use a smaller channel?
  >>
  >> Assuming your sectors are not overloaded... I would assume interference
  >> too.
  >>
  >> Now I would pitch Canopy... but I'm sure you don't want to hear that :-D
  >>
  >> Daniel White
  >> 3-dB Networks
  >> http://www.3dbnetworks.com
  >>
  >>
  >> >-----Original Message-----
  >> >From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
  >> >Behalf Of John Scrivner
  >> >Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:10 AM
  >> >To: WISPA General List
  >> >Subject: [WISPA] Tranzeo 900 Latency
  >> >
  >> >We have a couple of sectors of 900 MHz Tranzeo which were running fine
  >> >previously but seem to experience enormous latency at times now. I am
  >> >talking about upwards of 5000 milliseconds (5 full seconds) for a return
  >> >on
  >> >a ping. It is intermittent. I am guessing interference but was wondering
  >> >if
  >> >anyone had seen anything else cause this. We have had limited success in
  >> >dealing with interference in 900 MHz previously so we are hoping there
  >> >is
  >> >something else we can try before completely bailing on the band in those
  >> >locations. Any ideas are appreciated.
  >> >John Scrivner
  >> >
  >> >



  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to