* Jason Hensley wrote, On 8/20/2009 3:51 PM:
I know it works, but will the FCC come crashing down on me if they find out
I have these in place?
FIrst you need to lite-license yourself and make sure you (your
locations) are not in an exclusion zone. If so, then take 2. Otherwise,
proceed and follow the rules.
I also would use the Ligowave stuff as well even though I've used the
MTK stuff. I'm disappointed in the Ubiquiti stuff (at least 900) and
wouldn't want the same thing to happen there (3650)
leon
-----Original Message-----
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as much as an answer to my questions).
On 8/20/09, Jason Hensley <ja...@jaggartech.com> wrote:
I need a backhaul link outside of 2.4 and 5.8. If I put together a
Mikrotik
system, say an RB600 with an Xr3 and put a 20db Grid on each end would
that
be legal? Admittedly I'm not up to speed on what is and is not allowed in
3650 as far as power output, etc etc. This would be a short backhaul - 2
miles or less.
Along these same lines, can I build a PtMP 3650 system with these same
type
specs?
Thanks!
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.62/2315 - Release Date: 08/20/09
06:05:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
