SES Americom, and they suffer from cranial rectitus.


Tim Sylvester wrote:
> Who are "these people"? The FCC or the satellite earth station people?
>
> The FCC describes an alternative for determining a safe distance for
> locating a station with in an FSS protection zone in Appendix D of the
> Report and Order authorizing the 3.65 - 3.70 GHz band. You can read the full
> document here:
> http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.pdf
>
> This is the intro to the appendix.
>
> *********
> APPENDIX D: A Methodology For Locating Fixed Stations Within The FSS Earth
> Station
> Protection Zone
>
> The rules adopted herein require that fixed stations in the 3650-3700 MHz
> band be located at least
> 150 km from any grandfathered FSS earth station unless all affected
> licensees agree on closer spacing.
> Below, we present as an example, one methodology that can be used to
> determine a safe distance within
> the FSS earth station protection zone where a fixed station can be located
> without increasing the potential
> of that station to cause harmful interference to the earth station. We
> reiterate that this is being presented
> only as an example of one methodology. We recognize that there are many
> methods for providing the
> required protection, such as locating the fixed station behind an
> obstruction, and that licensees are free to
> propose any method they deem appropriate.
> *********
>
> I would assume that you could use this method to calculate the safe distance
> for operating at 3.65GHz and present it to the FCC and the FSS earth station
> operator.
>
> I will need to do this for my WiMAX deployment which will have two mountain
> ranges between the WiMAX network and the earth station.
>
> Tim
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of pat
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:43 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: [WISPA] 3.65GHz & Grandfathered satellite earth stations
>>
>> Anybody else having any luck with these people.  They're trying to tell
>> me I might have to clear all my customer sites for a proposed WiMax
>> deployment on a case by case basis.  I'm at the edge of the 150km
>> exclusion zone and have a mountain range in between us.  This is
>> getting
>> really annoying.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Pat
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>     
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>   



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to