On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 13:52 -0800, Gary Garrett wrote: > Yes, this is the answer I am looking for..... > Let me know when this is available / stable,
It looks (so far) as though the system is performing VERY WELL. Of the ones that I have tested with, I have had very positive results. One thing to beware of is that this is not something that will run well on a low end routerboard. I have run it on RB600 with about 600 users behind it, moving about 4k pps (aggregate) and it puts the cpu at 80-100%, although it is still processing packets well, that is a pretty hard limit for that platform. I just installed one today on an RB1000 with over 1500 users moving about 8k pps and it seems to run pretty well (cpu hits as much as about 80%). The 1500 user system is VERY congested, but the initial impression of the system looks good. I need to evaluate more data on these 2, which are the most critical tests so far, but both look good in my initial evaluation and those of the network administrators. > and you will soon become a rich man. I'd like that VERY MUCH, but won't be holding my breath. :-) -- ******************************************************************** * Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation* * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://www.wispa.org/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE! * ******************************************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
