1.  Define "overpopulation"?  I saw some numbers once that the entire
world's population could have a nice size house on a decent piece of
property in Texas...can't imagine the infrastructure requirements, but
whatever.
 
2.  Political corruption is a reality in any system.  It's the best argument
for term limits.  Personally, I'd like to see the personal limits on
contributions removed and make campaigns post their contributions on the
internet.  6-7 rich guys financed McGovern's campaign before all the
post-Watergate regulations. 
 

Regards,

Jeff


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106     (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)


 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 12:48 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulation of
net-neutrality


Just keep saying to yourself. 

1. Overpopulation is good. 

2  Political corruption does not exist. 

Good luck and best wishes. ;-) 

jack


RickG wrote: 

Jack, make that two trolls :)



With all due respect, isnt that exactly how liberals respond to conservative

claims - by demonizing them? Marks comments were spot on and I couldnt have

said them any better, so I'm resending them with my name on the end. I

respect your right to your viewpoint but I hope you have data to support the

claims. I know the the data is there for the more conservative claims. So,

just in case you hit delete:



Since the founding of the country until the 1960's, the federal government

rarely spent more than single digit percentaqes of everything we produce,

except in time of war.    We as a nation prospered immensely without a

department of education, federal welfare, and millions upon millions of

pages of regulations that covered everything from our toilet tank size to

the tags on your mattress.



It is precisely and amazingly preposterous to think that we could not

possibly "do without" this massive nanny state that's threatening to consume

nearly 35% of everything produced, and directly control over 1/2 of every

dollar earned in this country.    Your statement is utterly insulting to all

of us.    Not only can we live without the federal government's nose in

everything we do, we would be MUCH better off if it were so.   To tell me

that  I and all of the rest of us are incapable of survival without massive

intrusion into our lives by politicians in Washington DC is an insult that

is simply not forgivable in the common realm.



Not only could we do without 80% of all the agencies, we could do without

90% of all the millions of pages of rules and laws.   We could not only do

without, we would be healthier, happier, wealthier, and more responsible if

it were so.



Your comment has slipped over the edge from simple discussion of the merits

of federal actions vs our businesses and how we earn a living, to a blind

ideological fantasy, where all comes from Washington DC.    These things we

expect from Politicians... they are by nature self serving...   But why from

you?



-RickG



On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jack Unger  <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> wrote:



  

 Sorry Mark,



I truly appreciate and enjoy responding to all appropriate and responsible

posts but your LONG HISTORY of troll behavior will FOREVER elicit the same

response from me.



I will not feed the troll. I will not feed the troll. I will not feed the

troll. I will not feed the troll. I will not feed the troll.







MDK wrote:



Jack, it remains very  difficult to be civil, when you post this kind of

stuff.



Since the founding of the country until the 1960's, the federal government

rarely spent more than single digit percentaqes of everything we produce,

except in time of war.    We as a nation prospered immensely without a

department of education, federal welfare, and millions upon millions of

pages of regulations that covered everything from our toilet tank size to

the tags on your mattress.



It is precisely and amazingly preposterous to think that we could not

possibly "do without" this massive nanny state that's threatening to consume

nearly 35% of everything produced, and directly control over 1/2 of every

dollar earned in this country.    Your statement is utterly insulting to all

of us.    Not only can we live without the federal government's nose in

everything we do, we would be MUCH better off if it were so.   To tell me

that  I and all of the rest of us are incapable of survival without massive

intrusion into our lives by politicians in Washington DC is an insult that

is simply not forgivable in the common realm.



Not only could we do without 80% of all the agencies, we could do without

90% of all the millions of pages of rules and laws.   We could not only do

without, we would be healthier, happier, wealthier, and more responsible if

it were so.



Your comment has slipped over the edge from simple discussion of the merits

of federal actions vs our businesses and how we earn a living, to a blind

ideological fantasy, where all comes from Washington DC.    These things we

expect from Politicians... they are by nature self serving...   But why from

you?















--------------------------------------------------

From: "Jack Unger"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:48 PM

To: "WISPA General List"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulation
ofnet-neutrality> Brad,





 There is really only one way to get a smaller government without

throwing society into total disarray. That method is to have a smaller

country, in other words, a lower level of population. With an exploding

population there is just no way that I can see to get a smaller

government.



If only reclaiming our country for working people was as easy as voting

the incumbents out that would be GREAT but unfortunately it's not that

simple. Voting the incumbents out won't result in government doing a

better job for working people because the real influence is the

big-corporation money that finances the election campaigns for each new

crop of political nominees. The big-money lobbyists remain when each old

group of politicians is voted out so the big-money corporation's power

actually becomes greater and greater as time goes on.



The solution that I propose is equal public financing for ALL political

campaigns. Each nominee (and incumbent) would receive an equal number of

taxpayer dollars to run their campaign. This will help ALL candidates

remember who they are supposed to be working for (working-class

taxpayers, not large corporations).



As to regaining some influence for working people with regard to banks,

I'd recommend that everyone put their money in a local credit union or

small local community bank. My money has been kept in a local community

credit union for over 20 years and I feel good about it being there.

It's contributing to the community instead of being used in an

irresponsible fashion and/or used against the best interests of the

community.



Best,

         jack





Brad Belton wrote:





 The fundamental difference that Jack fails to recognize is if a bank (or

organization other than the government) does treat you unfairly you have

recourse.  If your own government treats you unfairly, you have little to

no

recourse.







Yes, we can all only hope the majority of Americans will continue to

stand

up and say no more to big government.  A smaller less intrusive

government

is what America needs.  In order to achieve this we have to remove the

career politicians from office that have clearly lost touch with the

people

that elected them.







Brad











From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>] On

Behalf Of Jack Unger

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:01 PM

To: WISPA General List

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulation

of

net-neutrality







So, now that government has been drowned, the huge banks, insurance

companies, telecoms can do whatever they want to you whenever they want

to

do it.



BWaaaah, haaa, haaaa, haaa, haaaaggggh....





Frank Crawford wrote:



YES



Jack Unger wrote:





I trust that government will be able to keep up just fine. Do you

support the alternative of making government so small that you can drown

it in a bathtub?



Glenn Kelley wrote:







Title II of the Communications Act-the section that regulates

telecommunications common carriers is now being considered by the FCC to

oversee broadband.  FCC Commissioner Robert M. McDowell during a talk he

gave to the Free State Foundation asked:  (see First Do No Harm: A

broadband

plan for Amercia)

"Exactly what kind of companies might get tangled up into this regulatory

Rubik's Cube?.Any Internet company that offers a voice application?" .

"With

this newfound authority, why stop at voice apps? Isn't voice just another

type of data app? As the distinction between network operators and

application providers continues to blur at an eye-popping rate, how will

the

government be able to keep up?"





Much more on the blog:   www.HostMedic.com -->

____________________________________________________________________________

_________

Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com

  Email: [email protected]

Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.







----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/























----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



















       --

Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.

Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing

Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since

1993www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  [email protected]













----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







--

Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.

Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing

Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
1993www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  [email protected]













----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



    





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

 

WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





  


-- 

Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.

Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing

Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
1993

www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  [email protected]








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to