1. And God said "Go and multiply". 2. Did I miss something? Nobody has said that where I can see.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Jack Unger <[email protected]> wrote: > Just keep saying to yourself. > > 1. Overpopulation is good. > > 2 Political corruption does not exist. > > Good luck and best wishes. ;-) > > jack > > > RickG wrote: > > Jack, make that two trolls :) > > With all due respect, isnt that exactly how liberals respond to conservative > claims - by demonizing them? Marks comments were spot on and I couldnt have > said them any better, so I'm resending them with my name on the end. I > respect your right to your viewpoint but I hope you have data to support the > claims. I know the the data is there for the more conservative claims. So, > just in case you hit delete: > > Since the founding of the country until the 1960's, the federal government > rarely spent more than single digit percentaqes of everything we produce, > except in time of war. We as a nation prospered immensely without a > department of education, federal welfare, and millions upon millions of > pages of regulations that covered everything from our toilet tank size to > the tags on your mattress. > > It is precisely and amazingly preposterous to think that we could not > possibly "do without" this massive nanny state that's threatening to consume > nearly 35% of everything produced, and directly control over 1/2 of every > dollar earned in this country. Your statement is utterly insulting to all > of us. Not only can we live without the federal government's nose in > everything we do, we would be MUCH better off if it were so. To tell me > that I and all of the rest of us are incapable of survival without massive > intrusion into our lives by politicians in Washington DC is an insult that > is simply not forgivable in the common realm. > > Not only could we do without 80% of all the agencies, we could do without > 90% of all the millions of pages of rules and laws. We could not only do > without, we would be healthier, happier, wealthier, and more responsible if > it were so. > > Your comment has slipped over the edge from simple discussion of the merits > of federal actions vs our businesses and how we earn a living, to a blind > ideological fantasy, where all comes from Washington DC. These things we > expect from Politicians... they are by nature self serving... But why from > you? > > -RickG > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jack Unger <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry Mark, > > I truly appreciate and enjoy responding to all appropriate and responsible > posts but your LONG HISTORY of troll behavior will FOREVER elicit the same > response from me. > > I will not feed the troll. I will not feed the troll. I will not feed the > troll. I will not feed the troll. I will not feed the troll. > > > > MDK wrote: > > Jack, it remains very difficult to be civil, when you post this kind of > stuff. > > Since the founding of the country until the 1960's, the federal government > rarely spent more than single digit percentaqes of everything we produce, > except in time of war. We as a nation prospered immensely without a > department of education, federal welfare, and millions upon millions of > pages of regulations that covered everything from our toilet tank size to > the tags on your mattress. > > It is precisely and amazingly preposterous to think that we could not > possibly "do without" this massive nanny state that's threatening to consume > nearly 35% of everything produced, and directly control over 1/2 of every > dollar earned in this country. Your statement is utterly insulting to all > of us. Not only can we live without the federal government's nose in > everything we do, we would be MUCH better off if it were so. To tell me > that I and all of the rest of us are incapable of survival without massive > intrusion into our lives by politicians in Washington DC is an insult that > is simply not forgivable in the common realm. > > Not only could we do without 80% of all the agencies, we could do without > 90% of all the millions of pages of rules and laws. We could not only do > without, we would be healthier, happier, wealthier, and more responsible if > it were so. > > Your comment has slipped over the edge from simple discussion of the merits > of federal actions vs our businesses and how we earn a living, to a blind > ideological fantasy, where all comes from Washington DC. These things we > expect from Politicians... they are by nature self serving... But why from > you? > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > -------------------- > From: "Jack Unger" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:48 PM > To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulation > ofnet-neutrality> Brad, > > > There is really only one way to get a smaller government without > throwing society into total disarray. That method is to have a smaller > country, in other words, a lower level of population. With an exploding > population there is just no way that I can see to get a smaller > government. > > If only reclaiming our country for working people was as easy as voting > the incumbents out that would be GREAT but unfortunately it's not that > simple. Voting the incumbents out won't result in government doing a > better job for working people because the real influence is the > big-corporation money that finances the election campaigns for each new > crop of political nominees. The big-money lobbyists remain when each old > group of politicians is voted out so the big-money corporation's power > actually becomes greater and greater as time goes on. > > The solution that I propose is equal public financing for ALL political > campaigns. Each nominee (and incumbent) would receive an equal number of > taxpayer dollars to run their campaign. This will help ALL candidates > remember who they are supposed to be working for (working-class > taxpayers, not large corporations). > > As to regaining some influence for working people with regard to banks, > I'd recommend that everyone put their money in a local credit union or > small local community bank. My money has been kept in a local community > credit union for over 20 years and I feel good about it being there. > It's contributing to the community instead of being used in an > irresponsible fashion and/or used against the best interests of the > community. > > Best, > jack > > > Brad Belton wrote: > > > The fundamental difference that Jack fails to recognize is if a bank (or > organization other than the government) does treat you unfairly you have > recourse. If your own government treats you unfairly, you have little to > no > recourse. > > > > Yes, we can all only hope the majority of Americans will continue to > stand > up and say no more to big government. A smaller less intrusive > government > is what America needs. In order to achieve this we have to remove the > career politicians from office that have clearly lost touch with the > people > that elected them. > > > > Brad > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > <[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Jack Unger > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:01 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulation > of > net-neutrality > > > > So, now that government has been drowned, the huge banks, insurance > companies, telecoms can do whatever they want to you whenever they want > to > do it. > > BWaaaah, haaa, haaaa, haaa, haaaaggggh.... > > > Frank Crawford wrote: > > YES > > Jack Unger wrote: > > > I trust that government will be able to keep up just fine. Do you > support the alternative of making government so small that you can drown > it in a bathtub? > > Glenn Kelley wrote: > > > > Title II of the Communications Act-the section that regulates > telecommunications common carriers is now being considered by the FCC to > oversee broadband. FCC Commissioner Robert M. McDowell during a talk he > gave to the Free State Foundation asked: (see First Do No Harm: A > broadband > plan for Amercia) > "Exactly what kind of companies might get tangled up into this regulatory > Rubik's Cube?.Any Internet company that offers a voice application?" . > "With > this newfound authority, why stop at voice apps? Isn't voice just another > type of data app? As the distinction between network operators and > application providers continues to blur at an eye-popping rate, how will > the > government be able to keep up?" > > > Much more on the blog: www.HostMedic.com --> > ____________________________________________________________________________ > _________ > Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com > > Email: [email protected] > Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. > Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing > Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since > 1993www.ask-wi.com 818-227-4220 [email protected] > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > -- > Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. > Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing > Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since > 1993www.ask-wi.com 818-227-4220 [email protected] > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -- > Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. > Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing > Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since > 1993www.ask-wi.com 818-227-4220 [email protected] > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
