OK That makes sense. Most bandpass filters I have seen have 250-350 Mhz windows. So if you run the unit on say channel 7 which is 2.435 GHz (I think) you would not be eliminating anything that is 125-175 MHz down or up. The only possibility I know of is using them when you are running standard non-overlapping configuration of channels 1, 7 and 11.
Otherwise you really can't get the channel separation you need for them to work as specified. Good Luck -B- Rogelio wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Bob Moldashel <lakel...@gbcx.net> wrote: > >> Are you sure you are seeing interference from cell systems and not from a >> 2.4 Ghz backhaul for T1's at this or an adjacent site or something else? I >> have never seen any 2.4 Ghz interference from any cell site equipment. Not >> saying it can't happen just nothing I have ever heard of and we deal with >> alot of that. >> > > "cell" as in a 2.4 GHz access radios covering a cell zone, not "cell" > as in a phone cellular side. Basically, there are nine 2.4 GHz radios > VERY close together, and performance is horrible (as you might > imagine). > > I'm looking to try to make chicken salad out of chicken crap here. > Someone suggested using cavity filters, so I'm looking into that > (something I haven't used before). > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
