With the exception of a diplexer on a full duplex microwave radio, Part 
15 filters are usually bandpass and are not high-low because there is 
only one channel.

And the cost is reasonable.  The last one we purchased was only about 
$200.  RF Linx.

But I agree with antennas, F/B ratio, higher gain to reduce lobes, 
shadow the antenna if possible, etc.  Of course if any of these are 
omni's most bets are off.

-B-



Mike wrote:
> I'd hate to step in any of that chicken crap here, but here goes.
>
> Cavities are usually in pairs, one tuned as a low pass and the other as a
> high pass.  Cavities have quite a lot of insertion loss which will adversely
> affect your receive.  Besides, they are expensive.  If the noise was out of
> band, I'd recommend a low/high pass filter.  Since it is in band, the best
> solution is to change your antennas if possible.  Higher gain will have a
> tighter lobe and be less susceptible to interference.  Change the polarity
> from vertical to horizontal or vice versa. Try to get some physical
> separation.  I have managed to build mesh screens between the feed point on
> an antenna and another intentional radiator.
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Rogelio
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:59 AM
> To: Bob Moldashel
> Cc: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] suggestions on 2.4 GHz cavity filters?
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Bob Moldashel <lakel...@gbcx.net> wrote:
>   
>> Are you sure you are seeing interference from cell systems and not from a
>> 2.4 Ghz backhaul for T1's at this or an adjacent site or something else?
>>     
>  I
>   
>> have never seen any 2.4 Ghz interference from any cell site equipment.
>>     
>  Not
>   
>> saying it can't happen just nothing I have ever heard of and we deal with
>> alot of that.
>>     
>
> "cell" as in a 2.4 GHz access radios covering a cell zone, not "cell"
> as in a phone cellular side. Basically, there are nine 2.4 GHz radios
> VERY close together, and performance is horrible (as you might
> imagine).
>
> I'm looking to try to make chicken salad out of chicken crap here.
> Someone suggested using cavity filters, so I'm looking into that
> (something I haven't used before).
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>   



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to