The only good statement out of this which may deserve Merit to us WISP is: > At the urging of liberal advocacy groups like Free Press and Public > Knowledge, Mr. Genachowski also wants to use the national broadband > plan as a vehicle for returning to the bad old 1990s era of "open access" > regulations. He recommends forcing major broadband providers like Time > Warner Cable and Qwest to share their high-speed networks with smaller > competitors at federally set rates. We can't think of a better way to > reduce capital investment and slow the build-out of high-speed networks.
Did they even give the "open access" a chance even back then? This was the start for the end of the dial-up ISP's. Do they not remember the end of "line sharing" in the early 2000's? The throw-off of what the big players did not think would ever succeed, being dial-up and what may come afterward? No, they were making big money even off that. Then they looked forward for once and saw that the future was not as bright as they had thought. NOW, they want it all, and still do! I will say again, let's go back to the Computer Inquires Acts and force these big players to go by the books...no cross subsidizing, an Enforcement Bureau at the FCC that can't be paid off, etc.... If they think we can not build our own networks out of what they have built(with gov't help), then us WISP have been building out networks that the big guys will not serve for almost 2 decades. The article claims that "open access slows buildouts and innovation." WTF? I know that we can prove that different. I have built networks out in the middle of BFE, and many of you have in much larger population areas! The big guys have not because they can't see a return in the next 10 years...that seems to happen when you have to bury fiber or copper into the middle of nowhere, without USF funds, or other gov't incentives. Being bent over in BFE, Scottie ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Jeff Broadwick" <[email protected]> Reply-To: WISPA General List <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:51:48 -0400 >Wow, Jack and Patrick. > >I respect the two of you as much as any two people in this industry. Has >the day come when posting an article about broadband, from a respected >national newspaper, warrants this sort of a response on list? I wasn't >trying to throw a bomb...I don't really have a firm opinion on this >particular matter. I thought that the List members would be interested in >the article. End of story. > >There are many different points of view on this List. I respect that and I >can respectfully disagree with just about anyone. I really try to keep my >personal political opinions confined to Facebook. If the day has come that >one cannot make this sort of post, then maybe it's time for me to drop off >of the List. > > >Regards, > >Jeff > > >Jeff Broadwick >ImageStream >800-813-5123 >begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 800-813-5123 end_of_the_skype_highlighting > x106 (US/Can) >+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l) > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Jack Unger >Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 4:46 PM >To: WISPA General List >Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ > >It's those damn communists. They're on the march again. Quick, man the >barricades! > >Wait, I'm wrong. It's AT&T and Verizon. They're on the march again. >Quick, open the gates to the City. > >Jeff Broadwick wrote: >> REVIEW & OUTLOOK MARCH 15, 2010 >> Broadband Trojan Horse >> The FCC has a new plan but doesn't want a vote. >> Health care isn't the only policy arena in which the Obama >> Administration aims to ram through controversial new rules. The >> Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil a "national >> broadband plan" opposed by industry and without any of the five >commissioners voting on it. >> >> Last year, Congress directed the FCC to develop a plan to make >> high-speed Internet available to more people. But given that 95% of >> Americans already have access to some form of broadband-and 94% can >> choose from at least four wireless carriers-rapid broadband deployment >> is already occurring without new government mandates. >> >> Since 1998, the FCC has classified broadband as an "information service" >> subject to less regulation than traditional telecom services. The >> Supreme Court's Brand X decision in 2005 validated that >> classification, and the upshot has been more investment, innovation >> and competition among Internet service providers, all to the benefit of >consumers. >> >> In 2009 alone, broadband providers spent nearly $60 billion on their >> networks. Absent any evidence of market failure, the best course for >> the FCC is to report back to Congress that a broadband industrial >> policy is unnecessary. Instead, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is >> moving to increase the reach of his agency and expand government control >of the Web. >> >> Among other things, he wants broadband services reclassified so the >> FCC can more heavily regulate them. The national broadband plan, to be >> unveiled tomorrow, will call for using the federal Universal Service >> Fund to subsidize broadband deployment. The USF currently subsidizes >> phone service in rural areas, and Mr. Genachowski knows that current >> law prevents it from being used to subsidize broadband unless >> broadband is reclassified as a telecom service. Congress ought to be >> wary of letting the FCC expand its jurisdiction through back doors like >this. >> >> Mr. Genachowski wants more control over broadband providers so that he >> can implement "net neutrality" rules that would dictate how AT&T, >> Verizon and other Internet service providers manage their networks. To >> date, Congress has given the FCC no such authority. Nor has the agency >> had success in court. Based on oral arguments last month, the D.C. >> Circuit Court of Appeals is almost certain to rule against the FCC in >> a case involving Comcast's network management. >> >> At the urging of liberal advocacy groups like Free Press and Public >> Knowledge, Mr. Genachowski also wants to use the national broadband >> plan as a vehicle for returning to the bad old 1990s era of "open access" >> regulations. He recommends forcing major broadband providers like Time >> Warner Cable and Qwest to share their high-speed networks with smaller >> competitors at federally set rates. We can't think of a better way to >> reduce capital investment and slow the build-out of high-speed networks. >> >> Mr. Genachowski's proposals are meeting resistance from telecom >> companies and fellow commissioners, which is reason enough to put his >> broadband plan to an agency vote. Instead, the chairman is urging his >> colleagues to sign a general statement that endorses the goals of the >> plan and ignores the details. >> >> "Instead of risking a split vote among the five regulators on >> approving the plan," reports National Journal, "Genachowski is seeking >> consensus on a joint statement, which sources said would provide him >> with some political cover for the controversies that are certain to be >> triggered by some of the plan's recommendations." >> >> The FCC chairman and his staff have spent the better part of a year >> preparing a major report while keeping his colleagues largely in the dark. >> What happened to the Obama Administration's promise to be open and >> transparent? >> >> Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved >> >> Regards, >> >> Jeff >> >> >> Jeff Broadwick >> Sales Manager, ImageStream >> 800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can) >> +1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l) >> +1 574-935-8488 (Fax) >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> >> > >-- >Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. >Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing Serving the >Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993 >www.ask-wi.com 818-227-4220 [email protected] > > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- >WISPA Wants You! Join today! >http://signup.wispa.org/ >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- > >WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >WISPA Wants You! Join today! >http://signup.wispa.org/ >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth. Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
