Do not feed the trolls :)

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Jack Unger <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's those damn communists. They're on the march again. Quick, man the
> barricades!
>
> Wait, I'm wrong. It's AT&T and Verizon. They're on the march again.
> Quick, open the gates to the City.
>
> Jeff Broadwick wrote:
>> REVIEW & OUTLOOK  MARCH 15, 2010
>> Broadband Trojan Horse
>> The FCC has a new plan but doesn't want a vote.
>> Health care isn't the only policy arena in which the Obama Administration
>> aims to ram through controversial new rules. The Federal Communications
>> Commission is set to unveil a "national broadband plan" opposed by industry
>> and without any of the five commissioners voting on it.
>>
>> Last year, Congress directed the FCC to develop a plan to make high-speed
>> Internet available to more people. But given that 95% of Americans already
>> have access to some form of broadband-and 94% can choose from at least four
>> wireless carriers-rapid broadband deployment is already occurring without
>> new government mandates.
>>
>> Since 1998, the FCC has classified broadband as an "information service"
>> subject to less regulation than traditional telecom services. The Supreme
>> Court's Brand X decision in 2005 validated that classification, and the
>> upshot has been more investment, innovation and competition among Internet
>> service providers, all to the benefit of consumers.
>>
>> In 2009 alone, broadband providers spent nearly $60 billion on their
>> networks. Absent any evidence of market failure, the best course for the FCC
>> is to report back to Congress that a broadband industrial policy is
>> unnecessary. Instead, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is moving to increase
>> the reach of his agency and expand government control of the Web.
>>
>> Among other things, he wants broadband services reclassified so the FCC can
>> more heavily regulate them. The national broadband plan, to be unveiled
>> tomorrow, will call for using the federal Universal Service Fund to
>> subsidize broadband deployment. The USF currently subsidizes phone service
>> in rural areas, and Mr. Genachowski knows that current law prevents it from
>> being used to subsidize broadband unless broadband is reclassified as a
>> telecom service. Congress ought to be wary of letting the FCC expand its
>> jurisdiction through back doors like this.
>>
>> Mr. Genachowski wants more control over broadband providers so that he can
>> implement "net neutrality" rules that would dictate how AT&T, Verizon and
>> other Internet service providers manage their networks. To date, Congress
>> has given the FCC no such authority. Nor has the agency had success in
>> court. Based on oral arguments last month, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
>> is almost certain to rule against the FCC in a case involving Comcast's
>> network management.
>>
>> At the urging of liberal advocacy groups like Free Press and Public
>> Knowledge, Mr. Genachowski also wants to use the national broadband plan as
>> a vehicle for returning to the bad old 1990s era of "open access"
>> regulations. He recommends forcing major broadband providers like Time
>> Warner Cable and Qwest to share their high-speed networks with smaller
>> competitors at federally set rates. We can't think of a better way to reduce
>> capital investment and slow the build-out of high-speed networks.
>>
>> Mr. Genachowski's proposals are meeting resistance from telecom companies
>> and fellow commissioners, which is reason enough to put his broadband plan
>> to an agency vote. Instead, the chairman is urging his colleagues to sign a
>> general statement that endorses the goals of the plan and ignores the
>> details.
>>
>> "Instead of risking a split vote among the five regulators on approving the
>> plan," reports National Journal, "Genachowski is seeking consensus on a
>> joint statement, which sources said would provide him with some political
>> cover for the controversies that are certain to be triggered by some of the
>> plan's recommendations."
>>
>> The FCC chairman and his staff have spent the better part of a year
>> preparing a major report while keeping his colleagues largely in the dark.
>> What happened to the Obama Administration's promise to be open and
>> transparent?
>>
>> Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>> Jeff Broadwick
>> Sales Manager, ImageStream
>> 800-813-5123 x106     (US/Can)
>> +1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)
>> +1 574-935-8488       (Fax)
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
> Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
> Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993
> www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to