There is no protocol design that can achieve that. A TDD system is a
population of time slots; if a bunch of users (not just a couple) with
high traffic demand (not low traffic or small bursts) have low
modulation, it will talke more time slots to serve them. If a fairness
system based on bandwidth is in place them all of the users will still
suffer; if a fairness system based on time-slots is in place they
won't get the service you promised them. There is no free lunch.

I've run a 3.5 GHz WiMAX system with 3.5 MHz channels and the base
station was always complaining the system was too oversubscribed;
guess what, it was right, we were trying to serve more than feasible
CIR/MIR traffic on those BSTs. Having a rule that only QAM16/QAM64
stations were allowed improved this problem a lot.


Rubens




On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <k...@wavelinc.com> wrote:
> I too have heard from others that WIMAX was designed so that the customers
> with poor connections don't take performance away from the rest with good
> connections. So far I have yet to hear ANYONE disprove this.
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:24 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
>
> I am not using alvarion 3.65 but I am using wimax. I have a couple
> customers with lower modulation because of non line of site situations
> and have seen no impact on the entire system in general. "Supposedly"
> wimax is engineered to handle some of this better than my alvarion 900.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That would only be true if the data services are somewhat
>> purpose-specific and not Internet access. Doing what this vendor told
>> you would seriously affect aggregate performance of the cell because
>> of low rate modulation of the NLOS and/or distant customers.
>>
>> If you are doing sensor networks or POS connection you will be fine
>> with all those BPSK/QPSK customers, indeed.
>>
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Kurt Fankhauser
>> <k...@wavelinc.com> wrote:
>>> Has anyone seen the Alvarion 3.65ghz 802.16e equipment in
>>> operation? Was
>>> talking to one vendor that claimed if you run the system in MIMO
>>> that with
>>> the diversity you can do NLOS as good as 900mhz and if you get the
>>> AP on a
>>> 300ft tower that it starts to "feel" like 700mhz. He claimed the
>>> NLOS was so
>>> good that people are ripping out complete old systems of 900mhz and
>>> 2.4ghz
>>> and putting in the single system of 3.65ghz to serve their entire
>>> customer
>>> base.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just wondering if anyone has experience or having seen this
>>> firsthand.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kurt Fankhauser
>>> WAVELINC
>>> P.O. Box 126
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>>> 419-562-6405
>>> www.wavelinc.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> ---
>> ---
>> ---
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ---
>> ---
>> ---
>> ---
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to