It seems to bridge ok, but I primarily NAT the customers. I've read reports it doesn't carry OSPF packets right.
On 4/26/10, Tom DeReggi <wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net> wrote: > Are you bridging at the AP and CPE, and does it work? > > Something something that was brought to my attention is that UBQT has Iperf > built in at teh command line. So technically, if we used UBQT at the CPE and > MT as AP, we could still do speed tests easilly, since all our MT APs plug > into our proprietary cell site routers which have Iperf. > > But does it bridge OK? We dont really need the MT AP. What we do need is 5-9 > port CPEs everyonce in a while, which locks us into the MT solutions in some > locations, or we ahve to add one more component of failure. Truthfully, that > is probably what we are going to start doing, where we decide to use UBQT. > Run UBQT radios, then put a MT router at the end where we need 5-9 ports. > They are pretty inexpensive now, its not that big a deal anymore to > duplicate expense. > > Tom DeReggi > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:11 PM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere? > > > I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs. Been very happy with them. > > I do lose the speed test on the CPE, but it hasn't really been a big loss > compared to what I save (something like $215 to $70 per CPE). > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue > that counts.” > --- Winston Churchill > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Tom DeReggi > <wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>wrote: > >> yeah, but wouldn't it be nice to use UBQT CPE for 95% of the installs, and >> still be able to use a 3-9 eth port SBC when it is needed the remainig 5%, >> without having to deploy a new AP? Of course, there is the option to use >> MT >> AP and UBQT CPE, but that wont happen in my network until the two share a >> common embedded speed testing tool, and verified common working polling or >> bridging (WDS) methods. >> >> I dont mind mismatching hardware brands, but prefer not to mismatch OSs, >> for >> the above reasons. I'd gladly pay a $100 license to prevent the install >> of >> a second AP that generates a new reocurring cost to have colocated. >> >> Tom DeReggi >> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc >> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> >> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards >> interfere? >> >> >> >From what I have heard memory requirements are much higher in RouterOS. >> >> I'd expect Mikrotik went out of their way to break it on Ubnt, too. >> >> Not to mention the fact that you'll need to buy a MT license for each >> device >> (even at $35/cpe that adds up). >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue >> that counts.” >> --- Winston Churchill >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Tom DeReggi >> <wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>wrote: >> >> > > I just wish I could load Router OS on my Ubiquity CPE's >> > >> > How do you know that you cant? >> > >> > UBQTs are MIPs processors and MT has MIPs compiled OSs. >> > >> > Has anyone tried? >> > >> > I'd argue the opposite... I love Mikrotik Hardware, the one entity that >> > understands the value of making Mutli-port ethernet at the CPE, with >> super >> > fast processors. >> > Wonder if Ubiquiti OS will load on 433AH? or RB800? >> > >> > Tom DeReggi >> > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc >> > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: Blair Davis >> > To: WISPA General List >> > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:34 AM >> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards >> > interfere? >> > >> > >> > The following is IMHO... YMMV... >> > >> > Only the R5H. >> > >> > Bought a lot of 5 a while back. Price looked good vs XR5. >> > >> > Started testing them... >> > >> > when hooked to the same ant, reported noise floor varied by 10db. >> > tx power, as reported by the other end of the link varied by 7db. >> > Units with strong tx had high error rates at higher modulations. >> > >> > thought bad batch, swapped out 4 of them. 1 of the new ones was ok, >> > other >> > 3 as bad as ones I swapped. Returned those 3 for credit. >> > >> > used the 2 I had left in CPE's. one went deaf after T-storm, (lost >> > 20db >> > of sensitivity) Other still in service. >> > >> > My XR5's all match on reported noise floor within 2db. >> > Tx power matches within 2db >> > I've never had any XR's bad out of the wrapper, and only 1 failed in >> the >> > field. (direct lighting strike) >> > >> > MikroTik makes great router software, and has learned to make good >> > SBC's >> > (routerboards) IMHO, their radio cards are 'not good'. (i'd have used >> > another word, but I don't want banned from the list!) >> > >> > Ubiquity makes GREAT radios. And good CPE's. They can't make good >> > software for an AP or router if their lives depend on it... >> > >> > I use routerboard with XR cards for my AP's and backhauls... I use >> > Nano's, >> > Loco's, and bullets for my CPE's now. >> > >> > MikroTik and Ubiquity together. >> > >> > I just wish I could load Router OS on my Ubiquity CPE's >> > >> > Kurt Fankhauser wrote: >> > What ad luck did you have with the mikrotik cards, and also what >> > model >> > card did you use? I only use the R5H from them. >> > >> > >> > >> > Kurt Fankhauser >> > WAVELINC >> > P.O. Box 126 >> > Bucyrus, OH 44820 >> > 419-562-6405 >> > www.wavelinc.com >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] >> On >> > Behalf Of Blair Davis >> > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:27 PM >> > To: WISPA General List >> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards >> > interfere? >> > >> > >> > >> > I'd love to see the same test with ubiquity XR cards.... >> > >> > I've had such bad luck with mikrotik's radio cards I don't use them >> any >> > more >> > >> > Because of the channel overlap, I've always put only one xr-2 or xr-9 >> > per metal enclosure. >> > >> > However, I often put two xr-5 cards in the same enclosure, and >> separate >> > them by 2 channels or more, and do the same with CM9's on the 5.x bands. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> > http://signup.wispa.org/ >> > >> > >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> > >> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > >> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> > http://signup.wispa.org/ >> > >> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> > >> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > >> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
