There is enough RAM (64mb), there just isn't a large enough Flash, only 8k. So not easy getting MT on a UBQT. But the otherway around could work. Meaning putting UBQT OS (more or less OpenWRT) onto the MT.
Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Ihnen" <os10ru...@gmail.com> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:30 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere? >I don't know about the newer "M" line but I know before that (speaking of >the NS, PS, Bullet, Microstation, Picostation) at least one hurdle people >were running into in their quest to put what they thought was "better" >firmware into the UBNT line was memory. There just wasn't enough. > > It would be nice if there was UBNT gear with RouterOS preloaded, similar > to how dd-WRT has partnered with some hardware manufacturers to offer > their hardware with dd-WRT preloaded. > > Greg > > On Apr 26, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote: > >>> I just wish I could load Router OS on my Ubiquity CPE's >> >> How do you know that you cant? >> >> UBQTs are MIPs processors and MT has MIPs compiled OSs. >> >> Has anyone tried? >> >> I'd argue the opposite... I love Mikrotik Hardware, the one entity that >> understands the value of making Mutli-port ethernet at the CPE, with >> super fast processors. >> Wonder if Ubiquiti OS will load on 433AH? or RB800? >> >> Tom DeReggi >> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc >> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Blair Davis >> To: WISPA General List >> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:34 AM >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards >> interfere? >> >> >> The following is IMHO... YMMV... >> >> Only the R5H. >> >> Bought a lot of 5 a while back. Price looked good vs XR5. >> >> Started testing them... >> >> when hooked to the same ant, reported noise floor varied by 10db. >> tx power, as reported by the other end of the link varied by 7db. >> Units with strong tx had high error rates at higher modulations. >> >> thought bad batch, swapped out 4 of them. 1 of the new ones was ok, >> other 3 as bad as ones I swapped. Returned those 3 for credit. >> >> used the 2 I had left in CPE's. one went deaf after T-storm, (lost 20db >> of sensitivity) Other still in service. >> >> My XR5's all match on reported noise floor within 2db. >> Tx power matches within 2db >> I've never had any XR's bad out of the wrapper, and only 1 failed in >> the field. (direct lighting strike) >> >> MikroTik makes great router software, and has learned to make good SBC's >> (routerboards) IMHO, their radio cards are 'not good'. (i'd have used >> another word, but I don't want banned from the list!) >> >> Ubiquity makes GREAT radios. And good CPE's. They can't make good >> software for an AP or router if their lives depend on it... >> >> I use routerboard with XR cards for my AP's and backhauls... I use >> Nano's, Loco's, and bullets for my CPE's now. >> >> MikroTik and Ubiquity together. >> >> I just wish I could load Router OS on my Ubiquity CPE's >> >> Kurt Fankhauser wrote: >> What ad luck did you have with the mikrotik cards, and also what model >> card did you use? I only use the R5H from them. >> >> >> >> Kurt Fankhauser >> WAVELINC >> P.O. Box 126 >> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >> 419-562-6405 >> www.wavelinc.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] >> On Behalf Of Blair Davis >> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:27 PM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards >> interfere? >> >> >> >> I'd love to see the same test with ubiquity XR cards.... >> >> I've had such bad luck with mikrotik's radio cards I don't use them >> any more >> >> Because of the channel overlap, I've always put only one xr-2 or xr-9 >> per metal enclosure. >> >> However, I often put two xr-5 cards in the same enclosure, and >> separate them by 2 channels or more, and do the same with CM9's on the >> 5.x bands. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
