arcnet, dude... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leon D. Zetekoff" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 4:27 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] (DIRECTLY) Connecting two wireless with a RF cable
> On 08/30/2010 06:39 PM, Paolo Di Francesco wrote: >> well, just using the usual things for non usual situations. >> >> I was considering: if I have to do more than 100 meters ethernet what >> would I use? well 100m of LMR400 can be a solution in some cases (yeah I >> know fiber, but as I said I was curious about RF cables). >> >> In a previous post I saw somebody talking about ethernet over coaxial, >> so this is like the same, but with no copper/RJ45 connector. It's >> directly into the router. I am not looking for speed, I was considering >> that even with 200m or 300m LMR400 cables you could do the same job. >> > <snip> > > to show my age...ethernet started on coax; RG8/u (thick-net) or RG58/u > (thin-net). 50 ohm terminators were on both sides. Connections were made > with BNC or in the case of RG8 I think it was an AUI connector. BNC T > connectors were used on each thin-net card. > > Also, who remember token-ring? I have a PCMCIA adapter for it. :-) > > Leon > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
