Ooooh forgot that one useless thing I did...led the team at Oregon State 
University that developed the implementation standard for Microsoft's Active 
Directory partitioning & replication, over a decade ago...still in use today 
with several hundred servers.  No need to mention the old ccMail system with 
over 300 post office databases sitting on Novell servers for which I & another 
guy wrote a series of batch files & apps nested 8 levels deep, to replicate 
directory changes between the post office databases...before ccMail had a 
directory update app that worked.  That was fun. 

Good stuff for a laugh and a nod for those who "understand" us older guys and 
our older protocols.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mark Nash - Lists 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] RIP vs other routing protocols


  Yes, there are lots of old things in my head.  I can dig out my old Netware 
CNE badge, ran 10-Base2, Token-Ring, Arcnet, Apple's PhoneNet, and can hang as 
a first chair tuba player in any of the top 10 symphony orchestras in our 
country, but to quote Leslie Nielson "That's not important right now".  

  And then there's the fact that I live quite comfortably, using RIP for my 
business.

  If it's time to change, we will change, but I haven't seen a compelling 
*enough* reason to get over my philosphical problem that I laid out in my 
previous post.  I want to know if this RIP "problem" is smoke & mirrors masking 
an ACTUAL problem.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Jeremy Parr 
    To: WISPA General List 
    Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:59 PM
    Subject: Re: [WISPA] RIP vs other routing protocols


    On 2 September 2010 16:38, Mark Nash - Lists <[email protected]> wrote:

      We know how to avoid routing loops.  As I said before, RIP has been 
around for decades and I know it well.  

      Our engineer wants to get us into OSPF, which I have no experience with 
and don't understand.  Since I don't really have anything to do with the 
operation of my business anymore, it's likely that I will never understand OSPF 
and that's why I'm having a problem. 

      It's philosophical.  I have felt in the past like my hands were tied when 
one person knew things about my network that I didn't know.  I don't like that 
feeling.  I know that I can do RIP.  I can fix whatever goes wrong if I need to.

      If it's stable and works like it should ;)

    Not to be snide, but you are probably the only person who still knows rip. 
;-P 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------




    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WISPA Wants You! Join today!
    http://signup.wispa.org/
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
    WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

    Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

    Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
  WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to