I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU)
side. I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at
the CCU they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper
fast though, especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower
usage customer.
Jon
On 9/10/2010 6:54 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this
equipment?
With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS
reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen
another WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients
are at -80 to -95. Are signals using this equipment that usable at
those rates? Can anyone shed some light on this really old gear? Any
information is appreciated...
Regards,
Chuck
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
