An elevated noise floor will push your avg rssi levels up basically
making your acceptable EUM signal levels higher than usual. A typical
EUM under perfect conditions can have link up to -89, but with an
elevated noise floor the acceptable signal level becomes higher and
higher. You'll need to run a spectrum analysis at the CCU to see what
noise floor you get.
A good way to test is with the <file get> and <file put> commands
either from the EUM or CCU. This performs a bandwidth test between
radios. My experience is that with a unacceptable connection the upload
will be really slow or non existent.
By the way, I have an excess inventory of these radios that I'm looking
to sell real cheap. Contact me off list if you're interested.
Jon
On 9/12/2010 12:53 AM, Chris Hudson wrote:
In the eum (client) use 'ra li' and make sure you see at least 6 for signal
strength and 3 for quality. Waveriders are polling protocol and high latency is
normal unless you keep the data connection active.
Chris
Chuck Hogg<[email protected]> wrote:
That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping
spikes. Is there any other commands than "air" that you would recommend for
trouble shooting and if there are do you mind explaining them?
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, [email protected]<
[email protected]> wrote:
I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU) side.
I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at the CCU
they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper fast though,
especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower usage customer.
Jon
On 9/10/2010 6:54 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment?
With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS
reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another
WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to
-95. Are signals using this equipment that usable at those rates? Can
anyone shed some light on this really old gear? Any information is
appreciated...
Regards,
Chuck
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
