At 10/30/2010 02:53 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
>Anyone else catch this?
>
>http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db0720/DOC-300297A1.pdf

I seem to recall its coming up in a thread around then, but can't 
find it offhand.  However, it is tied to the TDWR issue, and in 
August, WISPA and SpectrumBridge set up a TDWR database to help get 
this fixed.  So just this month, the FCC has started processing new 
approvals for the 5475-5725 band.  Good work on WISPA's part.  Maybe 
the UBNT radios will get the DFS needed to pass.

I don't really see why DFS is needed if you stay away from the 
5600-5650 TDWR band, but that's the FCC for you... maybe there are 
some other radars on the other frequencies though.  That band is 
legal in most other countries, so it's in the products.  And of 
course we Part 97 licensees can play (I do mean that literally, not 
commercial use) with radios on all sorts of frequencies, like 5850-5875. ;-)

  --
  Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
  ionary Consulting              http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to