>>I've got a small network with a MT RB-750 and UBNT (PS2's, NSL2's, >>NSLM5's, NSM5's and a BulletM2) and I'm wondering how we're going to >>fair if/when our upstream throws the switch on IPv6. I'd like to >>hear someone else is already doing it. >> >>Our "upstream" apparently is Hughesnet being resold in South >>America. I'm not sure if their system/our modem is IPv6 >>capable/ready. That may keep us on IPv4 and tunneled/nat'ed to IPv6 >>for some time. > > Personal opinion: IPv6 is worth less than the paper its RFC is > printed on. Ignore it and it will go away. Really.
I am very concerned being that only 2 percent of the IPv4 pool remains. http://ipv6.he.net/statistics/ In a few months we may not be able to get more IPv4 space. What then? NAT everyone? Ugh, with thousands of custommers thats an ugly proposition. How do you track down abuse, subpoena issues and so many other things... > If one of your subscribers really needs to reach something only > accessible via IPv6, they can tunnel out. But since there is no > compatibility, the "transition" plan requires dual stack. So > everything runs v4 until everybody is on v6. But since there's > always more on v4 (everybody) than on v6 (those who have added the > dual stack), there's no incentive for users to move to v4. The only > benefit is to some ISPs, not to users. So users have little reason > to move. (Sometimes users are smarter than some ISPs.) Plus v6 is > an abomination, a misdesign of immense proportions, so you shouldn't > buy into Cisco's fantasies. > > -- > Fred Goldstein k1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com > ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/ > +1 617 795 2701 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
