Inline reply's

On 2/8/2011 11:31 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble
<char...@knownelement.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
Comments inline.

jack


On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
Some serious enforcement is in order.  Major fines for repeated
offense...  $100K or more for 2nd offense...
Serious fines and maybe total revocation of $Individual/$corp to
transmit RF at all.
I am all for the steel boot <after> the first warning. Sometimes
slipups happen.
Repeated slipups is clear intent.
I agree with this totally.

Last month we recommended to the FCC OET that they publicize actions against
offenders who they locate. This would help get the message out that this is a
serious problem and that enforcement is in fact taking place.
That would be nice to see for many reasons.

Is that covered at http://fcc.gov/eb/Orders/Welcome.html or
http://fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/ ?

I'd rather see the TDWR band notched out than any kind of required GPS
and database...
Why? I think we operators need to work out a policing deal with the
FCC. If there was a easy way for the FAA/FCC
to let us know that interference is happening at site ABC. Maybe a
simple email list that we sign up to. This would
be more akin to hams self policing. I do /not/ want to lose the band.
Maybe we need a database that we can report
links that we see and their locations/suspected locations. I know I
have seen many illegal links and reports to the
FCC fall on deaf ears so long ago I stopped trying to report it.
Why?  Because it will likely raise the cost of the equipment quite a bit to include the GPS hardware and the database access system...


      
Notching may be the ultimate outcome for all new equipment. The disadvantage is
that notching deprives everyone from using the spectrum, even the 90% of
operators who are nowhere near a TDWR system.
Maybe the FCC needs to 'notch' the TDWR areas, like the 3.650
exclusion zones. I would hate for such large areas
to lose access but /I/ do not want to lose access because others are
being /%$#@/
I could go for a 'licensed lite' system for the 5.4 band... but, if there is no better enforcement on 5.4 than there is on 3.65, what is the point?

      
Very true.

What is going on with the 3.65 stuff?  I still think we need some kind
of license enforcement there...
Why?

WISPA recently had it's first 3650 Steering Committee meeting and it was agreed
that major work (education, best practices, possible rules changes, etc.) is
needed because the interference situation is getting way out of hand.
Hmmm. Interesting. That's news to me. Where does one see info about the
violations? Is it happening on private lists or something? I don't
recall any complaints on the WISPA general list about it.

 There are
also more and more illegal (unlicensed) "bootleggers" using the band. One
solution (among many) is to use a regional email list to coordinate between
different operators. This is in use now in Phoenix.
Hmmmm. Well illegal/unlicensed use is a clear enforcement action and
should be referred to the FCC EB. Coordination among entities... as I
recall that was very vague in the R&O.
Is the FCC feeling pressure to do the enforcement side of its job and
not wanting to, or is it unable, or ?
I am all for helping them clean things up. How can we as wisps do this
and how can wispa help us and
the FCC?

A) WISPS need a open place to report things we see
B) The FCC needs a place to report to us when it see's/receives a
report of interference.

Thoughts?
I mentioned this a month or two back...

In an area with NO other registered 3.65 locations, I have already found 3.65 gear in use.

Especially, UBNT NSM365 gear used as PtP to link up house to barn and so on...

I have proposed that equipment sellers be required to check for an FCC license before selling 3.65 gear.

I also KNOW of a WISP that was planning on deploying 3.65 gear without a license at all.



      

- --
Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com)
Systems craftsman for the stars
http://www.knownelement.com
Mobile: 626 539 4344
Office: 310 929 8793
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=3Dzr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to