Do we know if these areas suffered any marked increase in loss of electronic
systems due to the CME or other solar related events?
Scriv


On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:21 AM, St. Louis Broadband <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Ø  I don't see a direct causal relationship, it would not totally surprise
> me to see a co-causal relationship
>
> Fred, I am not sure of their relationship, but I am confident that there is
> one.
>
>
>
> Grounding is defiantly an issue all WISPs need to consider.  But it has
> been mentioned, if there was adequate warning, that we could also power down
> services and that would help in saving the equipment.
>
> I don’t know if this is factual.
>
>
>
> The most important time for communications would be during and after these
> events.
>
> It would be improper of us to not look for a potential solution to protect
> our networks, so that we can help with the response.
>
>
>
> IMHO.
>
>
>
> ~V~
>
>
>
> *From:* Fred Goldstein [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 15, 2011 11:06 AM
> *To:* [email protected]; WISPA General List
>
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OT (sort of) - Earthquakes and Solar Flares
>
>
>
> At 3/15/2011 10:29 AM, you wrote:
>
> ...
>
> With the last two X Class flares of this year, the X-Ray Absorption hit New
> Zealand and the second hit Japan!
> One-time we say coincidence, twice … well, that is good enough for me to
> say that there is a correlation and to keep a watchful eye.
> The region my family and I live in, is within the New Madrid Fault Zone, I
> have reason to be concerned.
>
> What this theory gives us is, time.
> If this becomes factual (need a few more X class flares) than what we have
> discovered is a window of time to prepare.
>
>
> I don't see any causality between solar activity and earthquakes.  The
> epicenter of the sendai quake was 25 kilometers below the surface.  Plates
> move.  Quakes happen.  Most solar ejecta doesn't penetrate that far down, or
> if it's neutrinos, it passes right through.
>
> So we have two problems, earthquakes and solar crud.  We still have to deal
> with them, even if one doesn't cause the other.  Electrical gear does need
> to take this into account.  I think good grounding is your friend...
>
> But even though I don't see a direct causal relationship, it would not
> totally surprise me to see a co-causal relationship, in that the same thing
> that causes the solar cycle may impact Earth too.  The sunspot cycles are
> caused by the movement of the plants, whose relationships align every 11,
> 22, and 500-odd years in ways that impact sunspots, presumably via
> gravitational effects.  That's how sunspot predictions are done (i learned
> this at a ham conference some years ago, a lecture by RCA Globecom's sunspot
> predictor, who also drew the sunspot furecasts for a ham magazine).  And if
> their gravity can impact the sun, it can probably impact the Earth.
>
>  --
>  Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
>  ionary Consulting                http://www.ionary.com/
>  +1 617 795 2701
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to