It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst case 3.65GHz scenario.
On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > What was the signal of the first link in 900? > > On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, "Simon Westlake" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz. > > > > The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see > > if 3.65GHz could handle it. > > > > I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is > > linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty > horrible. > > > > But I get about 3Mbps throughput. > > > > I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare > > situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the > > low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight > > NSM365. > > > > Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps. > > > > I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK > > with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be > 900MHz. > > > > On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote: > >> How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps > >> only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of > >> switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Patrick Nix, Jr., > >> Computer Network Solutions > >> CSWEB.NET <http://CSWEB.NET> Internet Services > >> IT Manager > >> > >> http://www.cnetworksolutions.com > >> http://www.csweb.net > >> > >> (918) 235-0414 > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and > >> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please > >> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and > >> destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a > >> person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be > illegal. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! > >> http://signup.wispa.org/ > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> > >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -- > > Simon Westlake > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > (920) 351-1010 > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Simon Westlake [email protected] (920) 351-1010 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
