I tested by driving my car about a mile away from the tower and holding an NSM365 through the sunroof of my car. I was at ~-75 or so.
I was pulling 18Mbps x 19Mbps at 10MHz channel width. Granted this was the only SM connected to the AP at the time. On 6/22/2011 10:52 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote: > In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT 3.65? > Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common, or > Private? > > Thanks, > > Patrick Nix, Jr., > Computer Network Solutions > CSWEB.NET Internet Services > IT Manager > http://www.cnetworksolutions.com > http://www.csweb.net > (918) 235-0414 > > > Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify > the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any > copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than > the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. > > -----Original Message----- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Simon Westlake > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:41 AM > To: wireless@wispa.org > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax > > I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz. > > The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see > if 3.65GHz could handle it. > > I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is > linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty horrible. > > But I get about 3Mbps throughput. > > I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare > situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the > low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight > NSM365. > > Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps. > > I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK > with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be 900MHz. > > On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote: >> How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps >> only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of >> switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues. >> >> Thanks >> >> Patrick Nix, Jr., >> Computer Network Solutions >> CSWEB.NET Internet Services >> IT Manager >> >> http://www.cnetworksolutions.com >> http://www.csweb.net >> >> (918) 235-0414 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and >> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please >> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and >> destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a >> person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com (920) 351-1010 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
