Depends on which model. I'm using Catalyst 3750's in my iBGP setup. They work fine. I'm sure they can function in an eBGP capacity, but not with a full table. The TCAM cannot handle more than 11k IPv4 unicast routes in the desktop routing template.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a00801e7bb9.shtml#topic3 On the other hand I have a Catalyst 6500 with the Supervisor 2 engine that can handle a full table from a few peers. A little more detail would be helpful. -- Blake Covarrubias On Jul 29, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: > Anyone using Catalyst Switches for BGP? How well do they handle it? > > Gino A. Villarini > g...@aeronetpr.com > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > 787.273.4143 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
