Not all of them are using Radio Mobile although many are. The basic Radio
Mobile plots are not the only tools they have to use. They also need
advanced GIS tools to convert the Radio Mobile plots to something in vector
file format. Radio Mobile plots are only images and do not scale when zoomed
in or out nor do they tell any other data attributes in a mapping database
such as the speed information or the carrier who offers the service there.

 

If WISP's would provide the data they most certainly use it. Most of these
mapping contractors are people who do not have any broadband experience.
They are tasked with asking for and gathering data. Some person made up the
data request for WISP's thinking that they need all this information so that
they will not constantly have to go back and forth once they sit down to do
the process on each carrier. Most of the RF engineering staff these states
have do not understand that WISP coverage can be generated in a much more
simple way than they are requesting. Ask the WISP's in Illinois who have
dealt with me. My way is much simpler for them to deal with.

 

Radio Mobile can and will generate very accurate maps in a skilled set of
hands. I have been using the program for 15 years now and helped in its
development with Roger. I have compared it to the various $50,000 and up
commercial RF tools I had at my disposal over the years. It's just as good
as what I have seen those tools kick out. The real world WISP experience is
also nice for additional input but not too many have taken the time to do
so. The semiannual map update process is a lot of work. The data that comes
in is usually a mess from almost all carriers and there is a huge amount of
post processing that needs to be done. Each state has to run the data sets
through a standardized error checking tool before submission to the NTA for
structure and uniformity. We are not allowed to send the data to them
without a clean error check tool. It can be a very daunting process.

 

WISP's are a very important element to showing how well a state is covered
yet most states don't yet realize it nor do they have an understanding of
the industry or the personalities of those who run those businesses. That is
not going to change any time in the near future so if the WISP industry
wants more respect it would be in their best interests to be as cooperative
and helpful in the mapping process as possible without giving up all their
personal business data. It can be done, I am doing it with the Illinois
WISP's and Matt Larsen has done it with my help in his states he covers.

 



Thank You,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 

From: Greg Ihnen [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 5:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Providing data to NTIA for Broadband mapping?

 

To me that hardly seems like a "study" if all they're doing is making
predictions with the same tools the WISPs make their predictions with and
publish them. And for that they want all the intimate details of your
business? The WISPs have Radio Mobile as well as all the real world
experience with actual signal strength measurements and knowledge of where
there's signal but it's not useable due to interference or Fresnel zone
issues etc.

 

Greg

 

On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:





In TX I know they just used radio mobile. 

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Brian Webster <[email protected]>
wrote:

No they are producing RF engineering maps and studies using RF propagation
tools.

 



Thank You,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com/> 

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 

From: Greg Ihnen [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: 'WISPA General List'


Subject: Re: [WISPA] Providing data to NTIA for Broadband mapping?

 

 

Brian,

 

            That's interesting. So they're actually making field
measurements?

 

            I suspect the state's RF staff is probably limited and stretched
thin in attempting to cover all the WISPs in the entire state. Their number
of measurements would have to be far below that of the WISP operator who has
rssi data from every CPE plus all of their pre-sales measurements. Added to
that how often could the state's RF staff be resampling? It seems like the
state would be much better served to accept the coverage data from the WISP
which would have to be more complete and up-to-date.

 

            If what they really want is coverage then that's the shortest
route.

 

            There's always a temptation in data collection to get everything
you can so you won't have to get more later if your focus changes and you
want to look at something else. That's what Google's Street View in trouble.

 

Greg

 

On Aug 3, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Brian Webster wrote:

 

The states who have their own RF staff are generating RF plots and creating
a polygon shape file of the coverage area the same as the cellular industry
have provided.

 



Thank You,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com/> 

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 

From: Greg Ihnen [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:21 PM
To: [email protected]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Providing data to NTIA for Broadband mapping?

 

They're conducting RF propagation studies? Is that not already cut and
dried?

 

How will their findings be presented? Will they be published?

 

Greg

 

On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Brian Webster wrote:





Brett,
          I am the mapping data coordinator for the Illinois portion of the
National Map. They are asking for so many details in anticipation that they
need to conduct RF propagation studies. If you don't want to provide so many
details but still want to participate in the map you can provide them with a
coverage are map and tell them the maximum upload and download advertised
speeds for those areas and they should be happy with that. Matt Larsen and I
went through the process with Nebraska. Took a little convincing to get them
to accept it but they ultimately did.



Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com/> 
www.Broadband-Mapping.com <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com/> 



 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> 
Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3807 - Release Date: 08/03/11

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> 
Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3807 - Release Date: 08/03/11




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3807 - Release Date: 08/03/11


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to