David... Makes total sense. I wish there was a way to +1 You!!!
- bob On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 9:19 AM, David Williamson < [email protected]> wrote: > Wow, I would not bridge the radios if I were you. That is a really > dangerous network proposition for creating unnecessary ARP and broadcast > traffic, and if you get someone infected with a virus or malware, it could > take down your entire network. We started out 3 ½ years ago doing that, > but within about 40-50 customers we realized it was a potential nightmare > and we quickly moved to NAT’ing all of our customers at the radio. Now, > the only customers that get bridged are ones that pay an extra $10/mo. for > a static public IP address. It is much safer that way in my opinion.**** > > ** ** > > I would definitely reconsider this topology and what possible heartburn it > can cause you, especially when it is on a WLAN network and you cannot > control what all your sub’s are able to do, like you can in a controlled > enterprise environment.**** > > ** ** > > Just my 2 cents. Take it for what it’s worth…**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > ** ** > > David Williamson > Owner**** > > Custom Computers & Winchester Wireless**** > > 2979 Valley Avenue**** > > Winchester, VA 22601 > Bob Wan Kim Technology Consultant on Plastic Surgeon Group http://sparkah.com/2011/11/12/top-plastic-surgeons-in-sf-san-francisco-to-see-in-2012/ 2611 S. PCH 101 San Diego, CA 92007 310 598 1606
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
