I've really missed my old Cobalt CacheRAQ. That thing was amazing. I lack the technical ability to set anything up though.
If we do one I'd like it to be a transparent pass through device. Upstream in one port, customers in the other. What would it cost to set something up (I already have a server that can be used) and what are people using? The issue I've been afraid of is the pass through speed. We pay for internet based on usage (95%th) and any Caching would save money and make things run faster. Ideas? Consultants? laters, marlon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rubens Kuhl" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY >> We have a site that costs @ $3800/month for (shared) 3Mbps/512Kbps >> (Satellite), so we have been caching with Mikrotik proxy since the >> beginning (1998). I found a caching system that works well and caches >> videos and other types of traffic. If anyone is in the same situation >> you may want to check out Thundercache. It's a little tough because the >> sites using it are mostly in Spanish. I have 400GB of cache on it (3 >> drives). Now the users will be able to be cached and retain their public >> IP. > > You probably mean Portuguese, not Spanish. Thundercache is a popular > but somewhat controversial cache here in Brazil due to GPL code > misappropriation. You might want to look at > InComum(http://sourceforge.net/projects/incomum/) for a free resource > or CacheMara from MaraSystems(http://www.marasystems.com/) for a > commercial product that gives back to the GPL codebase. > > > Rubens > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
