Yea but the FCC does not agree and I have no desire to find out what the fines might be. If I felt like skirting the rules I would lightup some Ubnt on 5.4 with DFS2. At least that has the radar scanning the FCC wants. They say they are just waiting on certs for the other M gear. I am feeling pressure from users and competitors and 5.4 will be the best way to relieve it.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > The way I see it, technically, is if the AP is in the air what does it > matter if you did another customer? > > I only have 1 AP that is using it, there were 2 customers. Never touched > them myself (2007 forward). They are moving to Ubnt 2.4 now. Didn't spend > any time researching rules. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Feb 27, 2012 8:40 PM, "Jeromie Reeves" <jree...@18-30chat.net> wrote: >> >> A contact at the FCC told me years ago that it meant you can not do >> /new/ installs of the old DFS gear. Anyone have a FCC rep saying >> something different? >> >> Why not Canopy? $2000 AP's, $400 CPE and 3~4mbit. I am sure that has >> came down since my first Canopy pack back in the pre-nehalm(sp) days. >> >> Looking at Axxcelera. Might be in the same vein and Canopy. Anyone >> with experience that wants to share? I do not want to just >> buy a stop gap product that will work till Ubnt get their stuff ready. >> This is going to be direction we head in once we find gear. >> >> Jeromie >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
