I'll never install a reflector setup. Don't ask why, I don't know.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Osborn" <[email protected]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:28:08 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] NanoStation M w/ Reflector Installs There is nothing easy about the nanobridge install. 100% PITA and the gain isn't very great. 10-12 db additional with a securalign or kpp. The power is much lower on the bridges also. 600 mw vs 200-300. On 3/23/2012 12:03 PM, Chris Gotstein wrote: trying to standardize on a single radio platform with the NSM2. On 3/23/2012 10:58 AM, [email protected] wrote: Why not just use Nanobridge? They work well, and are cheaper then NS2/Reflector combo, and easier to install, probably at the same gain. Regards Michael Baird ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Gotstein" <[email protected]> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> , "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:55:11 AM Subject: [WISPA] NanoStation M w/ Reflector Installs We have decided to standardize on the NanoStationM2 for all our 2.4Ghz installs. At this time, the installers use the lights on the radio for alignment. When using a reflector, they are complaining that they can't see the lights on the radio to align it. Besides allowing them to login to the radio to check signal, what are you guys doing to properly align the NSM radios when using a reflector? Is it as difficult as my installers are making it out to be? -- Thanks Greg Osborn Tech Support and Field Service Manager OnlyInternet.Net 1.800.363.0989 _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
