That's not how the system works. The other Tenants would still be using their OWN wireless network, only the floor that deployed Cisco WLC would be 'squashing' the "rouge AP's" from their OWN network.
Z On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Doug Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > Did any of you read the original posters question? > > I understand that the technology is out there to squash *"ROUGE AP's". * > Let me make this a little simpler. Lets' say we have an office building > with 6 floors and each floor is leased to a different tenant. > Lets say that the tenant on the fourth floor decides he is sick of > competing for airwaves for his wireless system and deploys the Cisco > or Motorola system and squashes all the other tenants APs. All the other > tenants APs now do not work because of the system which > has been put in place by the tenant on the fourth floor. Would this be a > violation of Part-15 if all the other tenants were to file a formal > complaint with the FCC? > ** > *-------Original Message-------* > > *From:* Greg Ihnen <[email protected]> > *Date:* 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM > *To:* WISPA General List <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [WISPA] Can they really do this? > > There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG list about the ins > and outs of setting up large temporary networks for things like > conventions. > > This one post caught my attention. Has anyone heard of a WiFi AP that will > spoof neighboring networks to intentionally interfere with them, not by > occupying/jamming the spectrum in a brute force way, but rather by > impersonating the other network and rejecting new associations? > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
