Not trolling, what you explain makes perfect sense. The original posters question is what threw me off. On Sep 24, 2012 10:25 AM, "Greg Ihnen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Obviously the intended/proper use isn't to interfere with other people's > legit networks. The intended use is to prevent rogue networks within your > own area where you want to maintain network security. > > So in the case you mention, the proper configuration is to whitelist the > other tenants' networks/APs and *not* interfere with their network. A > legit use might be to disassociate clients from a rogue AP that is on the > channel you're using, which is also using your SSID and is an obvious > attempt to lure people to use the rogue network probably for nefarious > reasons. > > Does this not make sense to you or are you trolling? > > Greg > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Zach Mann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So in turn, becoming exactly what it's trying to prevent??? A Rogue AP >> from the viewpoint of the other tenants who are simply trying to do >> business on a different floor. >> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Greg Ihnen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I believe the rogue countermeasures *could* be configured to >>> disassociate the other tenant's clients from the other tenant's AP. >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Zach Mann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> That's not how the system works. The other Tenants would still be >>>> using their OWN wireless network, only the floor that deployed Cisco WLC >>>> would be 'squashing' the "rouge AP's" from their OWN network. >>>> >>>> Z >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Doug Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Did any of you read the original posters question? >>>>> >>>>> I understand that the technology is out there to squash *"ROUGE >>>>> AP's". * >>>>> Let me make this a little simpler. Lets' say we have an office >>>>> building with 6 floors and each floor is leased to a different tenant. >>>>> Lets say that the tenant on the fourth floor decides he is sick of >>>>> competing for airwaves for his wireless system and deploys the Cisco >>>>> or Motorola system and squashes all the other tenants APs. All the >>>>> other tenants APs now do not work because of the system which >>>>> has been put in place by the tenant on the fourth floor. Would this >>>>> be a violation of Part-15 if all the other tenants were to file a formal >>>>> complaint with the FCC? >>>>> ** >>>>> *-------Original Message-------* >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Greg Ihnen <[email protected]> >>>>> *Date:* 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM >>>>> *To:* WISPA General List <[email protected]> >>>>> *Subject:* [WISPA] Can they really do this? >>>>> >>>>> There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG list about the >>>>> ins and outs of setting up large temporary networks for things like >>>>> conventions. >>>>> >>>>> This one post caught my attention. Has anyone heard of a WiFi AP that >>>>> will spoof neighboring networks to intentionally interfere with them, not >>>>> by occupying/jamming the spectrum in a brute force way, but rather by >>>>> impersonating the other network and rejecting new associations? >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wireless mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wireless mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
