We run MT, not UBNT, CPE, but it doesn't matter what brand it is. We run
them in as routers, but do not NAT. Same benefits others mentioned for
routing, just one fewer NAT. Never have a problem with it this way and
can't see any good reason to NAT there.
On 10/11/2012 3:46 PM, Arthur Stephens wrote:
We currently use Ubiquiti radios in bridge mode and assign a ip
address to the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using the Ubiquiti radio as a router.
Would like feed back why one would do this when it appears customers
would be double natted when they hook up their routers?
Or does it not matter from the customer experience?
Thanks
--
Arthur Stephens
Senior Sales Technician
Ptera Wireless Inc.
PO Box 135
24001 E Mission Suite 50
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
509-927-7837
For technical support visit http://www.ptera.net/support
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information,
and is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally
addressed.
Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views
or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and
are not intended to represent those of the company."
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2013.0.2677 / Virus Database: 2591/5802 - Release Date: 10/01/12
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik Advanced Certified
www.nwwnet.net
(765) 855-1060
(765) 439-4253
(855) 231-6239
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
