Keep in mind that it's Vyatta's routing implementation, not UBNT's.  I'd check 
on their roadmap for MPLS.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 8, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com> wrote:

> What about VLANing that traffic?  As fat as the ER. If enough  people want 
> MPLS they will add it. You can't say the same for MikroTik with their 
> egotistic mentality. 
> 
> Have you ever tried to convince them there is a bug?
> 
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 18:46, Fred Goldstein <fgoldst...@ionary.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/8/2013 6:23 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> I'm not so sure that MPLS support is being worked on. There is
>>> certainly no commitment to it from Ubiquiti's forum reps and based on
>>> the fact that there is no actively-maintained, feature-complete,
>>> freely-available MPLS implementation for Linux, I'm not holding my
>>> breath.
>>> 
>>> Why should I only run MPLS on a Cisco or Juniper device? There are many
>>> people happily running MPLS on routerOS, including VPLS which is not
>>> available on Cisco devices until you start to get into the very
>>> expensive end of town.
>> 
>> For the moment, if you're doing enterprise managed services (the highest 
>> profit end of the "ISP" business, though a stretch for most WISPs), MPLS 
>> is the only game in town.  You do it on a router that has it, or on a 
>> "switch" that has it.  Enterprises use their own IP space (usually 10.x) 
>> and thus service providers have to stay at a lower layer. And you can't 
>> really do VoIP decently (full quality) without some kind of QoS-enabled 
>> shim below IP.  If you're outside of the scope of a Carrier Ethernet VC, 
>> then you probably are using MPLS.
>> 
>> There is MPLS for Linux, which presumably is what RouterOS uses, since 
>> they don't make their own sources available and they'd probably have to 
>> if they wrote it.... So I'm surprised that Vyatta hasn't bothered with 
>> it.  Cisco is way too expensive.  RouterOS boxes on big Intel iron are 
>> more capable, though RouterOS can be a bid dodgey at times (as can a lot 
>> of other systems).
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 09.01.2013 10:11, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>> You are correct. No MPLS yet. But that is being worked on I'm sure.
>>>> On the other hand - if you really need MPLS shouldn't you be running
>>>> a
>>>> Cisco or a Juniper?
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 18:06, Andrew Jones <a...@jonesy.com.au> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The software does not do everything that mikrotik's routerOS does.
>>>>> Where is the MPLS support, something that many people use on
>>>>> routerOS?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Fred R. Goldstein              fred "at" interisle.net
>> Interisle Consulting Group
>> +1 617 795 2701
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to