Ubnt 900 is a joke
On Aug 22, 2013 7:43 AM, "Coenraad Loubser" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's not even an April fools joke.
> http://www.google.com/loon/
>
> Maybe if you can get hold of a human at Google you could interest them in
> running a trial with you...
>
>
> Coenraad Loubser
>
> WISH Networks (Pty) Ltd.
> 2nd Floor, Merriman Place, Cnr. Merriman & Bird Str, Stellenbosch, 7600, ZA
>
> Office: 087 805 7480
> Skype: Wish_Support
> Email: [email protected]
> Cell: 073 772 1223 (By appointment)
> Web: http://wish.org.za
>
> -- Spending Money is like watering a plant. Your money is your ultimate
> ballot.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Well the one I remember is Canopy and Ubnt on the same tower, both
>> 900.  The Canopy would rx more than enough to work while Ubnt wouldn't
>> hear the AP at all.  Moving around the trees (similar distance from
>> the tower) the signal would appear strong.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Almost every time someone has detailed their installations to me, there
>> just
>> > isn't enough signal to do anything. They're getting a -76 and wondering
>> why
>> > it doesn't work. Increase that another 15 dB and try again. The Canopy
>> will
>> > work a little better because it requires less signal, but it also has
>> > nowhere near the same throughput, so they're really apples and oranges.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----
>> > Mike Hammett
>> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> > http://www.ics-il.com
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:20:24 AM
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas
>> >
>> > Ubnt 900 apparently has extremely poor nlos for 900 MHz.  I've heard
>> > this a handful of people but haven't tried it myself.
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mike Hammett <
>> [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> How is it junk? IIRC, everyone I've asked that claimed a given 900 MHz
>> >> system was junk had a poor RF environment.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----
>> >> Mike Hammett
>> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> >> http://www.ics-il.com
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: "Erik Anderson" <[email protected]>
>> >> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:49:55 AM
>> >>
>> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas
>> >>
>> >> 98% of our terrain is heavily wooded. Ubiquiti 900 is junk (but their
>> >> other
>> >> products perform quite well when they can be used). Cambium 900 is
>> better.
>> >> Out limited experience with whitespace has been good. All of these
>> >> technologies have very low bandwidth.
>> >>
>> >> On 8/22/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Fabien wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What are you guys deploying lately in heavily wooded areas? We've used
>> >> both
>> >> Cambium pmp320 Wimax and UBNT M900, with mixed results on both. We just
>> >> put
>> >> up a 130ft tower in a heavily wooded river valley area, leaning towards
>> >> the
>> >> UBNT solution but hate putting money into something I'm not really
>> >> satisfied
>> >> with.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wireless mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wireless mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wireless mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wireless mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wireless mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to