We have used r admin for years one time charge for server software for
computer remote free
On Jan 23, 2014 9:56 AM, "James Howard" <ja...@litewire.net> wrote:

> We have a somewhat similar situation.  One of our CSRs moved to Texas
> (actually moved back since was originally from Texas) last year.  We cover
> our after-hours and weekend support through a rotating schedule of all
> employees who want to participate in it (on-call is paid separate from
> “work” pay).  We didn’t keep her as an employee when she moved but wrote a
> contract with her to continue to cover the after-hour shifts that she was
> covering before she moved.  We pay her a set rate per shift whether she
> gets any calls or not (just like we do with our employees who cover any of
> the after-hour shifts).  We give her VPN access to our systems but she has
> to provide her own equipment to connect and her own phone line to call
> customers.   Just make sure that if you make them a “contractor” that they
> actually fit under that definition and it doesn’t come back to bite you
> later on.  Either way (employee vs contractor) you still have no guarantee
> that the person isn’t going to sit and play games all day do you?  Do you
> have that guarantee when he was sitting at your office?  If I was having a
> person answer live calls (we just have her do call backs for after-hours
> support) I would provide a VoIP phone connected to our asterisk PBX though.
>
>
>
>
>
> James Howard
>
> LiteWire Internet Services, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
> Behalf Of *heith petersen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 22, 2014 7:27 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* [WISPA] remote employees
>
>
>
> I have a tech who does real light field work, who mostly works at a desk
> in my office. He usually handles the customer BS, like phone tech support
> above what we let our held desk handle, as well as radio configuration and
> updates and support to my field techs. Due to recent personal issues he is
> moving 4 hours away. We figure, since he doesn’t have a job yet and can get
> good high speed service, we might try to do a gig with us remotely. I would
> tunnel him into the net, access to billing, and a VoIP phone to our system,
> basically use him just like I do now, just no physical presence.
>
>
>
> Anyone else doing this or have past experience with this? If so, was it
> positive or total nightmare? We are trying to figure out how to base
> compensation. Right now he is hourly, I can see time tracking could be a
> pain. In reality he could just sit there and play solitaire all day if I
> don’t have any calls for him or any network upgrades.
>
>
>
> Anyways I appreciate your thoughts. I lean on him pretty hard to take care
> of BS that I shouldn’t have to deal with. Without him I see some pretty
> long days ahead. And I cant afford to keep a field tech in the office,
> though I have a guy that would rather sit on ass and talk to customers as
> opposed to doing field work.
>
>
>
> thanks
>
> heith
> ------------------------------
>
> *Total Control Panel*
>
> Login <https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net>
>
> To: 
> ja...@litewire.net<https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net>
>
> From: 
> wireless-boun...@wispa.org<https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=1870493402&domain=litewire.net>
>
> Message Score: 1
>
> High (60): Pass
>
> My Spam Blocking Level: High
>
> Medium (75): Pass
>
> Low (90): Pass
>
> Block<https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&bl-sender-address=1&rID=242260993&aID=1870493402&domain=litewire.net>this
>  sender /
> Block<https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&ent=1&bl-sender-address=1&rID=242260993&aID=1870493402&domain=litewire.net>this
>  sender enterprise-wide
>
> Block<https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&bl-sender-domain=1&rID=242260993&aID=1870493402&domain=litewire.net>
> wispa.org / 
> Block<https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&ent=1&bl-sender-domain=1&rID=242260993&aID=1870493402&domain=litewire.net>
> wispa.org enterprise-wide
>
> *This message was delivered because the content filter score did not
> exceed your filter level.*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to