Somethings are not a matter of belief, they are either demonstratably true or not.
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 27, 2014, at 14:39, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: haha, yeah, I know someone bought PureWave, but I think they're just doing a DBA PureWave. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ________________________________ From: "Chris Fabien" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:37:55 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Help Me Understand This WiMax Show We Had... Purewave also falls under "whatever their name is now" ... On Mar 27, 2014 5:13 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: PureWave, RunCom, Alvarion (well, whatever their name is now), the Aperto\Tranzeo guys, AirSpan was the first for the full 50 MHz, etc. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ________________________________ From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 2:51:51 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Help Me Understand This WiMax Show We Had... Yeah, I had heard canopy/cambium was doing other stuff. What are the other companies using though? Josh Reynolds Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | www.spitwspots.com On 03/27/2014 11:42 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Wimax on the pmp320 and others is 3.65 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 27, 2014 2:36 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Different frequencies (2.5 in the US, 2.3 in Asia, 3.3 and 3.5GHz in other areas) 5bps/Hz vs 2.7bps/Hz on 802.11-stuff smart antenna systems on the fly bandwidth and channel changes channel bandwidths of things like 1.25MHz - 20MHz hybrid automatic repeat-request (HARQ - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_automatic_repeat-request) etc. It's a different animal. It's very expensive though, and I've heard some pretty outrageous claims from it that I just don't believe. Josh Reynolds Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 03/27/2014 11:25 AM, Sam wrote: Today we had a company come to us pushing wimax. Admittedly I've never used wimax, nor do I know a lot about it. From what I can see looking at Google images of the technology and how it's deployed, it looks no different than the PtP and PtMP that we all use with 900 MHz, or 2.4 and 5.x GHz. Is the only advantage to wimax the presumably clearer and less-used frequencies upon which they operate? I had (evidently mistakenly) thought that perhaps wimax was a code word for some sort of mesh, and that's how it achieved NLOS service. However in looking at the network layouts on Google, it doesn't look like that at all. Rather, it looks like that add another AP to get around the obstruction(s), and simply backhaul it to an intermediary AP/tower to get it back to the PoP. Thanks Sam _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
