Wimax -GPS Sync: needed for good frequency reuse -Automatic transmit power control: so that CPEs only transmit at minimum necessary level instead of blasting all the time into the adjacent cells.
-uplink sub-channelization! Think of it like this: Rather than a CPE transmitting across the whole say 10mhz channel. 2 CPEs could each be transmitting using half the available subcarriers like Two 5mhz channels or 5 2mhz channels which dramatically increases uplink non-line of site penetration. Sma -MIMOA and MIMOB, A is more important for non line of site. Use one of many 5ghz vendors for LineOfSite Customers. Use wimax for non-lineOfSite customers. On 3/27/14, 4:08 PM, "Justin Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote: > As stated earlier Wimax is frequency independent. Wimax is also > referred >to as 802.16x. Last I knew they were up to revisionE, but I could be >wrong. Wimax is the ³generic term² for 802.16 just like wifi is the >generic term for 802.11. Wimax allows 8 bits per hertz no matter the >frequency used. 3.65 Wimax is the common frequency available to the normal >WISP operator. > >Some Reading: >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX > >http://compnetworking.about.com/od/wirelessinternet/g/bldef_wimax.htm > > > > > > Justin > > >-- >Justin Wilson <[email protected]> >MTCNA CCNA MTCRE MTCWE - COMTRAIN >Aol & Yahoo IM: j2sw >http://www.mtin.net/blog xISP News >http://www.zigwireless.com High Speed Internet Options >http://www.thebrotherswisp.com The Brothers Wisp > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sam <[email protected]> >Reply-To: WISPA General List <[email protected]> >Date: Thursday, March 27, 2014 at 3:25 PM >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: [WISPA] Help Me Understand This WiMax Show We Had... > >>Today we had a company come to us pushing wimax. Admittedly I've never >>used wimax, nor do I know a lot about it. From what I can see looking at >>Google images of the technology and how it's deployed, it looks no >>different than the PtP and PtMP that we all use with 900 MHz, or 2.4 and >>5.x GHz. >> >>Is the only advantage to wimax the presumably clearer and less-used >>frequencies upon which they operate? I had (evidently mistakenly) >>thought that perhaps wimax was a code word for some sort of mesh, and >>that's how it achieved NLOS service. However in looking at the network >>layouts on Google, it doesn't look like that at all. Rather, it looks >>like that add another AP to get around the obstruction(s), and simply >>backhaul it to an intermediary AP/tower to get it back to the PoP. >> >>Thanks >>Sam >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Wireless mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Wireless mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
